Peer-to-peer lending

Peer-to-peer lending, also abbreviated as P2P lending, is the practice of lending money to individuals or businesses through online services that match lenders with borrowers. Since peer-to-peer lending companies offering these services generally operate online, they can run with lower overhead and provide the service more cheaply than traditional financial institutions. As a result, lenders can earn higher returns compared to savings and investment products offered by banks, while borrowers can borrow money at lower interest rates,[1][2][3] even after the P2P lending company has taken a fee for providing the match-making platform and credit checking the borrower.[4][5][6][7] There is the risk of the borrower defaulting on the loans taken out from peer-lending websites.

Also known as crowdlending, many peer-to-peer loans are unsecured personal loans, though some of the largest amounts are lent to businesses. Secured loans are sometimes offered by using luxury assets such as jewelry, watches, vintage cars, fine art, buildings, aircraft and other business assets as collateral. They are made to an individual, company or charity. Other forms of peer-to-peer lending include student loans, commercial and real estate loans, payday loans, as well as secured business loans, leasing, and factoring.[8]

The interest rates can be set by lenders who compete for the lowest rate on the reverse auction model or fixed by the intermediary company on the basis of an analysis of the borrower's credit.[9] The lender's investment in the loan is not normally protected by any government guarantee. On some services, lenders mitigate the risk of bad debt by choosing which borrowers to lend to, and mitigate total risk by diversifying their investments among different borrowers. Other models involve the P2P lending company maintaining a separate, ringfenced fund, such as RateSetter's Provision Fund, which pays lenders back in the event the borrower defaults, but the value of such provision funds for lenders is subject to debate.[10]

The lending intermediaries are for-profit businesses; they generate revenue by collecting a one-time fee on funded loans from borrowers and by assessing a loan servicing fee to investors (tax-disadvantaged in the UK vs charging borrowers) or borrowers (either a fixed amount annually or a percentage of the loan amount). Compared to stock markets, peer-to-peer lending tends to have both less volatility and less liquidity.[11]


Peer-to-peer lending does not fit cleanly into any of the three traditional types of financial institutions—deposit takers, investors, insurers[12]—and is sometimes categorized as an alternative financial service.[13]

Typical characteristics of peer-to-peer lending are:

  • it is sometimes conducted for profit;
  • no necessary common bond or prior relationship between lenders and borrowers;
  • intermediation by a peer-to-peer lending company;
  • transactions take place online;
  • lenders may often choose which borrowers to invest in, if the P2P platform offers that facility;
  • the loans can be unsecured or secured and are not normally protected by government insurance but there can be protection funds like those offered by Zopa and RateSetter in the UK;
  • loans are securities that can be transferred to others, either for debt collection or profit, though not all P2P platforms provide transfer facilities or free pricing choices and costs can be very high, tens of percent of the amount sold, or nil.

Early peer-to-peer lending was also characterized by disintermediation and reliance on social networks but these features have started to disappear. While it is still true that the emergence of internet and e-commerce makes it possible to do away with traditional financial intermediaries and that people may be less likely to default to the members of their own social communities, the emergence of new intermediaries has proven to be time and cost saving. Extending crowdsourcing to unfamiliar lenders and borrowers opens up new opportunities.

Most peer-to-peer intermediaries provide the following services:

  • online investment platform to enable borrowers to attract lenders and investors to identify and purchase loans that meet their investment criteria
  • development of credit models for loan approvals and pricing
  • verifying borrower identity, bank account, employment and income
  • performing borrower credit checks and filtering out the unqualified borrowers
  • processing payments from borrowers and forwarding those payments to the lenders who invested in the loan
  • servicing loans, providing customer service to borrowers and attempting to collect payments from borrowers who are delinquent or in default
  • legal compliance and reporting
  • finding new lenders and borrowers (marketing)


United Kingdom

Zopa, founded in February 2005, has issued over £1.99 billion in loans.[14] Funding Circle became the first significant peer-to-business lender launching in August 2010 and offering small businesses loans from investors via the platform.[15] Funding Circle has lent over £1.93 billion as of January 2017.[16][17] Both Zopa and Funding Circle are members of the Peer 2 Peer Finance Association (P2PFA).[18]

In 2011, Quakle, a UK peer-to-peer lender founded in 2010, closed down with a near 100% default rate after attempting to measure a borrower's creditworthiness according to a group score, similar to the feedback scores on eBay; the model failed to encourage repayment.[19][20]

By June 2012, the top three peer-to-peer companies in the UK - RateSetter, Zopa, and FundingCircle - had issued over £250 million of loans.[21] In 2014 alone, they issued over £700 million.[22]

In 2012, the UK government invested £20 million into British businesses via peer to peer lenders. A second investment of £40 million was announced in 2014.[23] The intention was to bypass the high street banks, which were reluctant to lend to smaller companies. This action was criticised for creating unfair competition in the UK, by concentrating financial support in the largest platforms.[24]

Investments have qualified for tax advantages through the Innovative Finance Individual Savings Account (IFISA) since April 2016.[25] In 2016, £80bn was invested in ISAs,[26] creating a significant opportunity for P2P platforms. By January 2017, 17 P2P providers were approved to offer the product.[27]

Many more peer-to-peer companies have also set up in the UK. At one stage there were over 100 individual platforms applying for FCA authorisation, although many have now withdrawn their applications.[28]

Since April 2014, the peer-to-peer lending industry has been regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority[29] to increase accountability with standard reporting and facilitate the growth of the sector.[30] Peer-to-peer investments do not qualify for protection from the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS), which provides security up to £75,000 per bank, for each saver,[31] but regulations mandate the companies to implement arrangements to ensure the servicing of the loans even if the platform goes bust.[32]

In 2015, UK peer-to-peer lenders collectively lent over £3bn to consumers and businesses.[33]

According to the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (Entrenching Innovation Report), £3.55B was attributed to Peer to Peer alternative finance models, the largest growth area being property showing a rise of 88% from 2015 to 2016.[34]

United States

The peer-to-peer lending industry in the US started in February 2006 with the launch of Prosper, followed by Lending Club and other lending platforms soon thereafter.[35] Both Prosper and Lending Club are located in San Francisco, California.[36] Early peer-to-peer platforms had few restrictions on borrower eligibility, which resulted in adverse selection problems and high borrower default rates. In addition, some investors viewed the lack of liquidity for these loans, most of which have a minimum three-year term, as undesirable.[13]

In 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) required that peer-to-peer companies register their offerings as securities, pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933.[35][37] The registration process was an arduous one; Prosper and Lending Club had to temporarily suspend offering new loans,[38][39][40][41] while others, such as the U.K.-based Zopa Ltd., exited the U.S. market entirely.[38] Both Lending Club and Prosper gained approval from the SEC to offer investors notes backed by payments received on the loans. Prosper amended its filing to allow banks to sell previously funded loans on the Prosper platform.[13] Both Lending Club and Prosper formed partnerships with FOLIO Investing to create a secondary market for their notes, providing liquidity to investors.[42] Lending Club had a voluntary registration at this time, whereas Prosper had mandatory registration for all members.[43]

This addressed the liquidity problem and, in contrast to traditional securitization markets, resulted in making the loan requests of peer-to-peer companies more transparent for the lenders and secondary buyers who can access the detailed information concerning each individual loan (without knowing the actual identities of borrowers) before deciding which loans to fund.[38] The peer-to-peer companies are also required to detail their offerings in a regularly updated prospectus. The SEC makes the reports available to the public via their EDGAR (Electronic Data-Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval) system.

More people turned to peer-to-peer companies for lending and borrowing following the financial crisis of late 2000-s because banks refused to increase their loan portfolios. On the other hand, the peer-to-peer market also faced increased investor scrutiny because borrowers' defaults became more frequent and investors were unwilling to take on unnecessary risk.[44]

As of June 2012, Lending Club is the largest peer-to-peer lender in US based upon issued loan volume and revenue, followed by Prosper.[35][36] Lending Club is currently also the world's largest peer-to-peer lending platform.[45] The two largest companies have collectively serviced over 180,000 loans with $2 billion in total:[21][35][36] as of March 22, 2012, Lending Club has issued 117,412 loans for $1,512,560,075[46] while Prosper Marketplace has issued 63,023 loans for $433,570,651.[47] With greater than 100% year over year growth, peer-to-peer lending is one of the fastest growing investments.[35] The interest rates range from 5.6%-35.8%, depending on the loan term and borrower rating.[48] The default rates vary from about 1.5% to 10% for the more risky borrowers.[36] Executives from traditional financial institutions are joining the peer-to-peer companies as board members, lenders and investors,[21][49] indicating that the new financing model is establishing itself in the mainstream.[37]


In recent years a very large number of micro loan companies have emerged to serve the 40 million SMEs, many of which receive inadequate financing from state-owned banks, creating an entire industry that runs alongside big banks.

As the Internet and ecommerce took off in the country in the 2000s, many P2P lenders sprung into existence with various target customers and business models.[50]

The first P2PL in Hong Kong is WeLab, which has backing from American venture capital firm Sequoia Capital and Li Ka-Shing's TOM Group.[51]

Ezubao, a website launched by Yucheng Group in July 2014 purporting to offer P2P services, was shut down in February 2016 by authorities who described it as a Ponzi scheme.[52] As 900,000 customers had invested 50 billion renminbi in Ezubao, its closure might undermine confidence in P2P in China.[53]

In China, in 2016 there were more than 4000 P2P lending platform in total, but 2000 of them had already suspended operations.[54] As of August 2016, cash flow on all P2P lending platform have already exceeded 191 billion Chinese Yuan (29 billion USD) in the month.[55] Lender's return rate across all P2P lending platform in China is about 10% per annum on average, with a few of them offering more than 24% return rate.[56] A colloquial term for P2P lending in Chinese translates as "grey market", but is not to be confused with grey markets for goods or an underground economy.

In June and July 2018, scores of Chinese online P2P lending platforms fell into financial or legal troubles because of tightened regulation and liquidity. According to, a P2P industry information provider, 23 P2P platforms were reported to be in financial distress or under investigation in the first 10 days of July. That follows 63 such cases in June, a higher number than in any month in the previous year.[57]

In late June, Shanghai police detained four senior executives of Tangxiaoseng, an online lending platform controlled by Zibang Financial Service Internet Technology Co. Ltd. and told investors onJune 28, 2018 that that Zibang Financial was suspected of "illegally raising funds from the public."[58] On July 20, 2018,, a Beijng-based P2P lending platform announced to close down, citing "deteriorating online lending environment and drying up liquidity."[59]

People's Bank of China announced in early July 2018 said that regulators will extend a two-year-old nationwide campaign to clean up fraud and violations in the online financial market, targeting P2P and other online lending and financial activities. More than 5,000 operations have been shut down since the campaign began in 2016.[60]


In 2012 Australia's first peer to peer lending platform, SocietyOne, was launched.[61] As of June 2016 the Australian Government has been encouraging the development of FinTech and peer to peer lending startups through its 'regulatory sandbox' program.[62]

New Zealand

In New Zealand, peer-to-peer lending became practicable on April 1, 2014, when the relevant provisions of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 came into force. The Act enables peer-to-peer lending services to be licensed.[63]

The Financial Markets Authority issued the first peer-to-peer lending service licence on July 8, 2014, to Harmoney.[64] Harmoney officially launched its service on October 10, 2014.[65]


In India, peer-to-peer lending is currently regulated by the Reserve Bank of India, India's Central Bank. It has published a consultation paper on regulation of P2P lending[66] and the final guidelines are expected soon.[67][68] There were over 30 peer-to-peer-lending platforms in India in 2016.[69] Even with first-mover advantage many sites were not able to capture market share and grow their user base, arguably because of the reserved nature of Indian investors or lack of awareness of this type of debt financing. However, peer-to-peer lending platforms in India are helping a huge section of borrowers who have previously been rejected or have failed to qualify for a loan from banks.[70] Peer to peer lending has helped consumers with no or poor credit scores get loans in categories such as consumer lending, small business lending and property lending.[71]

PaisaDukan became the first new entrant in Peer to Peer Lending market to get certificate of registration (CoR) from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) in Indian history.[72][73] In 2019, two more companies, RupeeCircle and IndiaMoneyMart, were licensed by the Reserve Bank of India.[74][75][76]


Peer-to-peer-lending in Sweden is regulated by Finansinspektionen.[77] Launched in 2007, the company Trustbuddy AB was first out on the Swedish market for peer-to-peer-lending, providing a platform for high risk personal loans between 500SEK and 10,000SEK. Trustbuddy filed for bankruptcy by October 2015, a new board cited abuses by outgoing leadership.


Several peer-to-peer lending services initiated operation and loan origination during 2014, Following the economic uprising of 2011,[78] and public opinion regarding these platforms is positive. The maximum interest rate in Israeli P2P Arenas is limited by the "Extra-Banking Lending Regulations".[79]


Peer-to-Peer P2P Lending for both real estate-secured and non-real estate-secured transactions by either investors or borrowers, is a mature industry in Canada. Peer-to-Peer P2P lending in real estate-secured transactions is regulated by members of the Mortgage Broker Regulators' Council of Canada (MBRCC),[80] including: the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO),[81] the Real Estate Council of Alberta (RECA) [82] and the Financial Institutions Commission of British Columbia (FICOM BC).[83] Starting as early as April 9, 2005 Canada's Private Lending Network® is incontestably [the word "incontestable" is legislatively defined, pursuant to Canada's Federal Trade-marks Act R.S.C., 1985, c. T-13)[84]] recognized by Canadian federal government public records[85] as Canada's first network devoted to peer-to-peer P2P lending in both regulated mortgages (real-estate secured) and non-regulated loans (non-real-estate secured). Proof of federal recognition, registration and "date of first use as April 09, 2005" is found at the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO).[85] Since inception, member individuals and organizations who use the Canada's Private Lending Network® platform are continuously registered with Canadian federal or provincial mortgage securities regulators including (but not limited to): the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO),[86] the Real Estate Council of Alberta (RECA) [87] and the Financial Institutions Commission of British Columbia (FICOM BC).[83] Canada's Private Lending Network® has the further distinction of being the world's first and only peer-to-peer P2P network with continuous registration to ISO 9001:2015[88] since May 9, 2008.[89] ISO 9001:2015 is published by the International Organization for Standardization [90] and is the National Standard for Quality Management Systems in 119 countries[91] and registration thereto provides legislators, regulators, customers, prospective customers and other interested parties with at-a-glance "confidence that their products are safe, reliable and of good quality.".[92] Canadian Capital Markets Securities Regulators (members of the Canadian Securities Administrators)[93] are recent entrants to Canadian Peer-to-Peer P2P lending and are only issuing interim approvals " order to test their products, services and applications throughout the Canadian market on a time limited basis.,[94] through "Regulatory Sandbox" programs including the CSA Regulatory Sandbox[94] and the Ontario Securities Commission Sandbox, branded as "OSC Launchpad".[95]


Since April 2018, Brazilian p2p lending companies may operate directly without the intermediation of a bank or other financial institution.[96]

By means of the Resolution 4656/2018, the Central Bank of Brazil created a new type of institution called SEP (personal lending society) that aims to provide a platform for direct negotiation of loans between individuals and companies. A SEP cannot lend using its own resources but only operate as an intermediary. The borrower must be Brazilian individual or company, but there isn't a restriction regarding lenders nationality.[97]


Latvian P2P lending market is developing very rapidly. In Q2 2018 Latvian P2P platforms lent Eur 271.8 million and Eur 1.7 Billion cumulatively.[98] Currently, the most active investors in Latvia’s peer-to-peer lending platforms are residents of Germany, Great Britain, and Estonia.[99]

The two biggest P2P platforms are Mintos and Twino taking over 60% and 20% of market share respectively. Around 9 companies that qualify as P2P investment platform currently operate in Latvia. Mintos was founded in 2015. In September 2018 the total amount of loans funded through Mintos have surpassed Eur 1 billion. Most of the loans funded through Mintos are personal loans with car loans coming second.[100] In 2016 Mintos has raised Eur 2 million in funding from Latvian based Venture Capital Skillion Ventures.[101] Twino investment platform was launched in 2015, although the company has been operating since 2009 as a loan originator. Since the inception in 2009 TWINO has lent more than Eur 500 million in loans.[102] More than 90% of all loans that are on TWINO platform are short maturity from 1 to 3 months.[103]

In 2015, the Ministry of Finance of Latvia initiated development of a new regulation on the peer-to-peer lending in Latvia to establish regulatory requirements, such as rules for management compliance, AML requirements and other prudential measures.[104]


Ireland's first P2P lending platform is Linked Finance. Launched in 2013, the online marketplace connects Irish businesses who need loans with Ireland's largest online lending community. In 2016, Linked Finance was also authorised to operate in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority.[105]

In 2017, Linked Finance completed its 1000th loan[106] and appointed a new Chairman, former Ryanair Deputy CEO, Michael Cawley.[107] Following this, the company also raised €2 million in equity investment to support its plans for expansion.[108]


In Indonesia, P2P lending is growing fast in recent years and is regulated under OJK since 2016. As of Dec 2017, there are 22 P2P platforms registered in OJK. P2P platforms provide loans in particular targeting into unbanked population, which is estimated around 100+ million in Indonesia.


There is no specific Peer-to-Peer lending regulation in Bulgaria. Currently, Klear Lending is the only Bulgarian platform. It was launched in 2016 and provides personal loans to prime customers. The Peer-to-Peer lending platform is operated by Klear Lending AD, a financial institution registered in the Register per art. 3a of the Credit Institutions Act maintained by the Bulgarian National Bank.[109]


In Korea, Money Auction and Pop Funding are the very first peer to peer lending companies founded in 2006 and 2007 respectively.[110] Korean P2P lending industry did not attract much public attention until late 2014 and early 2015, during which period a number of new fintech companies were founded underpinned by the global fintech wave with the emergence of Lending Club as the mainstream P2P lending player in the US. New P2P lending companies launched in Korea during this period include 8 Percent, Terafunding, Lendit, Honest Fund and Funda.[111] At the beginning, 8 Percent, Lendit and Honest Fund focused on personal loan origination and Terafunding was the only P2P platform dedicated to the real estate backed loan origination, founded by ex-real estate broker and investor, Tae Young Yang.

There was a brief period of regulatory uncertainty on the P2P business model as the P2P lending model was not officially legalized under the then regulatory regime. 8 percent was briefly shut down by the regulator in Feb 2015 and was reopened again.[112] Korean P2P industry saw an explosive growth in a year. According to the regulator, cumulative P2P lending platform loan origination increased to KRW 311,800,000,000 as of December in 2016 from KRW 72,400,000,000 in March and there was a debate as to whether the industry was getting overheated, with questions on whether the industry offered appropriate investor protection.[113] To respond to these concerns, as of February 2017, Korean regulator imposed an annual investment limit of KRW 10,000,000 for a retail investor on these lending platforms, and KRW 40,000,000 for certain qualified investors.[114]

As of April 2017, there are 148 P2P lending companies in Korea. However, only 40 companies are official members of the Korea P2P Finance Association. These members include Lendit, Roof Funding, Midrate, HF Honest Fund, Villy, 8 Percent, Terafunding, Together Funding and People Funding.[115] According to the Korea P2P Finance Association, cumulative loan lent by its member P2P companies stands at c. KRW 2.3 TRN as of March 2018. By origination category, real estate project financing origination constitutes c. KRW 768,500,000,000, real estate asset backed origination is KRW 611,500,000,000, other asset backed KRW 472,400,000,000 and personal loan origination stands at KRW 443,200,000,000.[116] Average interest yield offered by the member companies is 14.32%.

In Korea, Terafunding is a market leader by volume with KRW 323Bn cumulative loan originated up to March 2018[117] and Terafunding is the first peer to peer lending platform to launch retail P2P linked fund in partnership with Korean retail banks, Industrial Bank of Korea and Kyongnam Bank.[118]

P2P Companies Cumulative Loan Origination Amount as of March 2018, according to the Korea P2P Finance Association[119]

  1. Terafunding: KRW 323 Bn
  2. Roof Funding: KRW 184 Bn
  3. People Fund: KRW 178 Bn
  4. Together Funding: RW 142 Bn
  5. Honest Fund:KRW 124 Bn

Legal regulation

In many countries, soliciting investments from the general public is considered illegal. Crowd sourcing arrangements in which people are asked to contribute money in exchange for potential profits based on the work of others are considered to be securities.

Dealing with financial securities is connected to the problem about ownership: in case of person-to-person loans, the problem of who owns the loans (notes) and how that ownership is transferred between the originator of the loan (the person-to-person lending company) and the individual lender(s).[39][40] This question arises especially when a peer-to-peer lending company does not merely connect lenders and borrowers but also borrows money from users and then lends it out again. Such activity is interpreted as a sale of securities, and a broker-dealer license and the registration of the person-to-person investment contract is required for the process to be legal. The license and registration can be obtained at a securities regulatory agency such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the U.S., the Ontario Securities Commission in Ontario, Canada, the Autorité des marchés financiers in France and Québec, Canada, or the Financial Services Authority in the UK.

Securities offered by the U.S. peer-to-peer lenders are registered with and regulated by the SEC. A recent report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office explored the potential for additional regulatory oversight by Consumer Financial Protection Bureau or the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, though neither organization has proposed direct oversight of peer-to-peer lending at this time.[120] In 2016, New York state sent "warning letters" threatening to require 28 peer-to-peer lenders to obtain a license to operate unless they "immediately" complied with responses to demands to disclose their lending practices and products available in the state.[121]

In the UK, the emergence of multiple competing lending companies and problems with subprime loans has resulted in calls for additional legislative measures that institute minimum capital standards and checks on risk controls to preclude lending to riskier borrowers, using unscrupulous lenders or misleading consumers about lending terms.[122]

Advantages and criticism

Interest rates

One of the main advantages of person-to-person lending for borrowers can sometimes be better rates than traditional bank rates can offer.[123] The advantages for lenders can be higher returns than obtainable from a savings account or other investments, but subject to risk of loss, unlike a savings account.[124] Interest rates and the methodology for calculating those rates varies among peer-to-peer lending platforms. The interest rates may also have a lower volatility than other investment types.[125]

Socially-conscious investment

For investors interested in socially conscious investing, peer-to-peer lending offers the possibility of supporting the attempts of individuals to break free from high-rate debt, assist persons engaged in occupations or activities that are deemed moral and positive to the community, and avoid investment in persons employed in industries deemed immoral or detrimental to community.[126][127]

Credit risk

Peer-to-peer lending also attracts borrowers who, because of their credit status or the lack thereof, are unqualified for traditional bank loans. Because past behavior is frequently indicative of future performance and low credit scores correlate with high likelihood of default, peer-to-peer intermediaries have started to decline a large number of applicants and charge higher interest rates to riskier borrowers that are approved.[44] Some broker companies are also instituting funds into which each borrower makes a contribution and from which lenders are recompensed if a borrower is unable to pay back the loan.[19]

It seemed initially that one of the appealing characteristics of peer-to-peer lending for investors was low default rates, e.g. Prosper's default rate was quoted to be only at about 2.7 percent in 2007.[124]

The actual default rates for the loans originated by Prosper in 2007 were in fact higher than projected. Prosper's aggregate return (across all credit grades and as measured by, based upon actual Prosper marketplace data) for the 2007 vintage was (6.44)%, for the 2008 vintage (2.44)%, and for the 2009 vintage 8.10%. Independent projections for the 2010 vintage are of an aggregate return of 9.87.[128] During the period from 2006 through October 2008 (referred to as 'Prosper 1.0'), Prosper issued 28,936 loans, all of which have since matured. 18,480 of the loans fully paid off and 10,456 loans defaulted, a default rate of 36.1%. $46,671,123 of the $178,560,222 loaned out during this period was written off by investors, a loss rate of 26.1%.[129]

Since inception, Lending Club’s default rate ranges from 1.4% for top-rated three-year loans to 9.8% for the riskiest loans.[36]

The UK peer-to-peer lenders quote the ratio of bad loans at 0.84% for Zopa of the £200m during its first seven years of lending history. As of November 2013, Funding Circle’s current bad debt level was 1.5%, with an average 5.8% return after all bad debt and fees. This is comparable to the 3-5% ratio of mainstream banks and the result of modern credit models and efficient risk management technologies used by P2P companies.[20]

At the other end of the range are places such as Bondora that do lending to less credit-worthy customers, with default rates varying up to as high as 70+% for loans made to Slovak borrowers on that platform, well above those of its original Estonian market.

Government protection

Because, unlike depositors in banks, peer-to-peer lenders can choose themselves whether to lend their money to safer borrowers with lower interest rates or to riskier borrowers with higher returns, in the US peer-to-peer lending is treated legally as investment and the repayment in case of borrower defaulting is not guaranteed by the federal government (U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) the way bank deposits are.[130]

A class action lawsuit, Hellum v. Prosper Marketplace, Inc. was held in Superior Court of California on behalf of all investors who purchased a note on the Prosper platform between January 1, 2006 and October 14, 2008. The plaintiffs alleged that Prosper offered and sold unqualified and unregistered securities, in violation of California and federal securities laws during that period. Plaintiffs further allege that Prosper acted as an unlicensed broker/dealer in California. The Plaintiffs were seeking rescission of the loan notes, rescissory damages, damages, and attorneys' fees and expenses.[131] On July 19, 2013 the class action lawsuit was settled. Under the settlement terms Prosper will pay $10 million to the class action members.[132]

Peer-to-peer lending sponsors

Peer-to-peer lending sponsors are organizations that handle loan administration on behalf of others including individual lenders and lending agencies, but do not loan their own money.[133][134] Notable peer-to-peer lending sponsors include:

See also


  1. ^ "P2P Lending: What is an Expected Return? A Survey of Industry Voices". LendingMemo. 2013-09-27. Retrieved 2017-03-28.
  2. ^ "Savings Account as Investment - The Simple Dollar". The Simple Dollar. 2011-12-11. Retrieved 2017-03-28.
  3. ^ "Here's How the Average Savings Account Interest Rate Compares to Yours | GOBankingRates". GOBankingRates. 2017-03-23. Retrieved 2017-03-28.
  4. ^ "Rates & Fees". Retrieved 2017-03-28.
  5. ^ "What fees does Lending Club charge investors?". Lending Club. Retrieved 2017-03-28.
  6. ^ "Prosper Help". Archived from the original on 2013-02-12. Retrieved 2017-03-28.
  7. ^ "Interest Rates and Fees on Lending Club & Prosper Loans". LendingMemo. 2014-04-30. Retrieved 2017-03-28.
  8. ^ Moenninghoff, S., Wieandt, A. "The Future of Peer-to-Peer Finance". SSRN 2439088. Missing or empty |url= (help); |access-date= requires |url= (help)CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
  9. ^ Lepro, Sara (December 20, 2010). "Prosper Ditches Auction Pricing for Model Like P-to-P Rival's". American Banker. Retrieved July 31, 2012.
  10. ^ "P2P investing firm calls for end to provision funds". Retrieved March 3, 2017.
  11. ^ J. D. Roth Taking a Peek at Peer-to-Peer Lending Time November 15, 2012; Accessed March 22, 2013.
  12. ^ Robert E. Wright; Vincenzo Quadrini. Chapter 2 Section 5: Financial Intermediaries (PDF). Retrieved August 5, 2012.
  13. ^ a b c Bradley, Christine; Burhouse, Susan; Gratton, Heather; Miller, Rae-Ann (2009). "Alternative Financial Services: A Primer". FDIC Quarterly. 3 (Q1). Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Retrieved July 30, 2012
  14. ^ Key facts; Accessed January 31, 2017
  15. ^ Patrick Collinson (August 28, 2010). "Peer-to-peer lending and saving: Making everyone happy". The Guardian.
  16. ^ Statistics; Retrieved January 31, 2017
  17. ^ Kiki Loizou (October 20, 2013). "Start-ups to the power of three". The Sunday Times.
  18. ^ Members of the Peer-to-Peer Finance Association; Accessed June 26, 2016
  19. ^ a b Dunn, Sam (December 7, 2011). "Fears grow over safety of 'peer-to-peer' savings after lender Quakle goes bust". Daily Mail. Retrieved August 2, 2012.
  20. ^ a b Moulds, Josephine (June 9, 2012). "Are peer-to-peer lenders the future of banking?". The Guardian. Retrieved July 25, 2012.
  21. ^ a b c Goff, Sharlene (June 13, 2012). "Peer-to-peer lending: Model takes off worldwide". Financial Times. Retrieved August 2, 2012.
  22. ^ "2015 UK Volume Predictions". AltFi. December 23, 2014. Retrieved August 19, 2015.
  23. ^ "New £40 million investment by British Business Bank to support £450 million of lending to smaller businesses". February 25, 2015. Retrieved August 19, 2015.
  24. ^ "Government interference risks distorting UK P2P market, say lenders". Financial Times. October 26, 2014. Retrieved August 19, 2015.
  25. ^ "Income Tax: Innovative Finance Individual Savings Account and peer to peer loans - GOV.UK". HM Revenue & Customs. Retrieved 2017-01-31.
  26. ^ "Individual Savings Account (ISA) Statistics" (PDF). HM Revenue & Customs. Retrieved 2017-01-01.
  27. ^ "ISAs authorised managers - GOV.UK". Retrieved 2017-01-31.
  28. ^ "26% of P2P lenders withdraw FCA applications for authorisation". Bovill. Retrieved March 24, 2016.
  29. ^ Jonathan Moules (December 7, 2012). "Government boost for peer-to-peer lending". Financial Times.
  30. ^ "Funding Circle Picks Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley for IPO". 2018-03-11. Retrieved 2018-03-11.
  31. ^ "New deposit protection limit coming on 1 January |FSCS". Retrieved March 24, 2016.
  32. ^ "Peer-to-peer: FCA confirms new rules". Retrieved March 24, 2016.
  33. ^ "Pushing boundaries: the 2015 UK alternative finance industry report | Nesta". Retrieved March 24, 2016.
  34. ^
  35. ^ a b c d e Renton, Peter (May 29, 2012). "Peer To peer lending crosses $1 billion in loans issued". Techcrunch. Retrieved July 25, 2012.
  36. ^ a b c d e Barth, Chris (June 6, 2012). "Looking for 10% yields? Go online for peer to peer lending". Forbes. Retrieved July 25, 2012.
  37. ^ a b Alloway, Tracy; Moore, Elaine (April 23, 2012). "Mack moves to cutting edge of P2P lending". Financial Times. Retrieved July 20, 2012.
  38. ^ a b c Jane J. Kim (April 28, 2009). "Peer-To-Peer Lender Relaunched". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved July 25, 2012.
  39. ^ a b Hendrickson, Mark (April 8, 2008). "Peer Lending Club Puts Hold on Lending Activity While It Sorts Out Some Legal Issues". Techcrunch. Retrieved August 2, 2012.
  40. ^ a b "Lending Club Shuts Down (Temporarily?)". Peer-Lend. Retrieved April 8, 2008.
  41. ^ "Quiet Period". Lending Club. Archived from the original on May 17, 2008. Retrieved April 8, 2008.
  42. ^ Jonnelle Marte (September 26, 2010). "Credit Crunch Gives 'Microlending' a Boost". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved August 23, 2012.
  43. ^ David Bogoslaw (April 6, 2009). "Peer-to-Peer Lending: Problems and Promise". BusinessWeek. Retrieved June 27, 2013.
  44. ^ a b Kennard, Matt; Bond, Shannon (November 24, 2011). "Interest soars in US peer-to-peer lending". Financial Times. Retrieved July 20, 2012.
  45. ^ Schumpeter Peer review The Economist January 5, 2013; Accessed March 22, 2013.
  46. ^ "Loan Performance Statistics". Lending Club. Retrieved August 13, 2012.
  47. ^ "Prosper: Marketplace Performance". Prosper Marketplace, Inc. Retrieved August 13, 2012.
  48. ^ Steinisch, Monica (June 2012). "Peer-to-peer lending survey". Consumer Action. Retrieved July 23, 2012.
  49. ^ Taylor, Colleen (June 6, 2012). "Lending Club Lands $17.5 Million from Kleiner Perkins and Morgan Stanley Chairman John Mack". Tech Crunch. Retrieved June 8, 2012.
  50. ^ Yangjie She. "China: The Different Categories of Peer to Peer Lending Platforms". Crowdfund Insider.
  51. ^ Michelle Yuan. "Hong Kong's First Peer-to-Peer Lender Raises Funds of its Own". WSJ.
  52. ^ Gough, Neil (February 2, 2016). "Online Lender Ezubao Took $7.6 Billion in Ponzi Scheme, China Says". The New York Times. Retrieved February 2, 2016.
  53. ^ Shen, Samuel; Ruwitch, John. "China police arrest 21 over $7.6 bln online financial scam". Reuters. Retrieved February 2, 2016.
  54. ^ "再减68家 P2P正常运营平台数创近一年新低__网贷资讯_网贷之家". Retrieved September 28, 2018.
  55. ^ "《P2P网贷行业2016年8月月报》正式发布-爱投资". Retrieved September 28, 2018.
  56. ^ "8月P2P综合收益率再降 预计9月或将跌破10%__网贷资讯_网贷之家". Retrieved September 28, 2018.
  57. ^ "Regulators' Pledge to Help P2P Investors Comes With Warning - Caixin Global". Retrieved 2018-08-14.
  58. ^ "Another Online Lender Falls Under Investigation - Caixin Global". Retrieved 2018-08-14.
  59. ^ "China's P2P Online Lending Dominoes Continue to Fall - Caixin Global". Retrieved 2018-08-14.
  60. ^ "China Vows Continued Tight Grip on Internet Finance - Caixin Global". Retrieved 2018-08-14.
  61. ^ "SocietyOne takes on big banks with peer-to-peer online loans". ARN Net. Retrieved June 29, 2015.
  62. ^ "Launch of an innovative regulatory sandbox for FinTech". Australian Government Treasury.
  63. ^
  64. ^ "FMA issues New Zealand's first licence for peer-to-peer lending services".
  65. ^ "Harmoney launches with $100m to lend - Personal Finance".
  66. ^ "RBI Peer To Peer Lending Consultation Paper" (PDF). RBI Official. April 2016.
  67. ^ "P2P lending on growth trajectory ahead of RBI guidelines". 12 September 2016 – via Business Standard.
  68. ^ "Peer to Peer Lending RBI Regulation & Licensing Requirement". Enterslice. 2017-08-21. Retrieved 2017-08-22.
  69. ^ "RBI proposes P2P lending regulations". Livemint. 29 April 2016.
  70. ^ Dutt, Gaurav (May 2017). "How P2P lending startups in India are helping the uncatered borrowers get access to cheap and easy finance". Medium.
  71. ^ "Peer to Peer Lending License by Enterslice". Retrieved 2017-08-22.
  72. ^ "Lending platform BigWin Infotech gets NBFC-P2P certification from RBI". Medianama. 5 July 2018.
  73. ^ "BigWin Infotech receives CoR from RBI". Hindu Business Line. 5 July 2018.
  74. ^
  75. ^
  76. ^
  77. ^ "FI tar kontroll över ny lånetrend". Retrieved February 24, 2015.
  78. ^ he:המחאה החברתית בישראל 2011
  79. ^ "". Retrieved September 28, 2018.
  80. ^ "MBRCC - Welcome". Retrieved September 28, 2018.
  81. ^ Ontario, Financial Services Commission of. "Licensing FAQ". Retrieved September 28, 2018.
  82. ^
  83. ^ a b "FICOM - Mortgage Brokers - Index". Retrieved September 28, 2018.
  84. ^ Branch, Legislative Services. "Consolidated federal laws of canada, Trade-marks Act". Retrieved September 28, 2018.
  85. ^ a b "Canadian Trademarks Details 1391367 - Canadian Trademarks Database - Intellectual property and copyright - Canadian Intellectual Property Office - Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada". Retrieved September 28, 2018.
  86. ^ Ontario, Financial Services Commission of. "Mortgage Brokering". Retrieved September 28, 2018.
  87. ^ "Reca Home". RECA. Retrieved September 28, 2018.
  88. ^ "ISO 9001 Quality management". Retrieved September 28, 2018.
  89. ^
  90. ^ "ISO - International Organization for Standardization". Retrieved September 28, 2018.
  91. ^ "Members". Retrieved September 28, 2018.
  92. ^ "Benefits of standards". Retrieved September 28, 2018.
  93. ^ "Canadian Securities Administrators - Who we are - Overview". Retrieved September 28, 2018.
  94. ^ a b "CSA - Industry Resources - CSA Regulatory Sandbox". Retrieved September 28, 2018.
  95. ^ Commission, Ontario Securities. "OSC LaunchPad". Retrieved September 28, 2018.
  96. ^ "Fintechs poderão conceder crédito sem mediação de banco".
  97. ^ Banco Central, [1], Banco Central, 17 de agosto de 2018
  98. ^ "Alternative financial services association of Latvia". LAFPA. Retrieved 2018-10-03.
  100. ^ "Statistics". Mintos. Retrieved 2018-10-03.
  101. ^ "Latvia's Mintos Scores Eur2 million investment for P2P loans marketplace". Techcrunch. Retrieved 2018-10-03.
  102. ^ "Quick Facts". Twino. Retrieved 2018-10-03.
  103. ^ "Statistics". Twino. Retrieved 2018-10-03.
  104. ^ "Latvia: Review of the Financial System" (PDF). OECD. 2016-04-01. Retrieved 2017-07-02.
  105. ^ "P2P lender Linked Finance receives UK authorisation". May 22, 2017. Retrieved September 28, 2018.
  106. ^ "Linked Finance secures 1,000th loan for SMEs -". Retrieved September 28, 2018.
  107. ^ "Cawley to chair peer-to-peer lender Linked Finance". Retrieved September 28, 2018.
  108. ^ "Linked Finance aims to increase peer-to-peer lending". October 12, 2017. Retrieved September 28, 2018.
  109. ^ "Financial Institutions Register under Art.3a of LCI". Bulgarian National Bank.
  110. ^ Namu Wiki P2P Finance 2018-04-02.
  111. ^ Korea P2P Finance Association Member Date of Establishment Retrieved 2018-04-23
  112. ^
  113. ^
  114. ^
  115. ^
  116. ^
  117. ^
  118. ^
  119. ^ "한국P2P금융협회". Retrieved September 28, 2018.
  120. ^ "PERSON-TO-PERSON LENDING: New Regulatory Challenges Could Emerge as the Industry Grows (Report to Congressional Committees)" (PDF). United States Government Accountability Office. July 2011. Retrieved August 23, 2012.
  121. ^ New York Legal News - Ongoing Investigation Into The P2P Lending Industry
  122. ^ Sean Farrell (September 20, 2010). "Zopa calls on Government and FSA to regulate social lending sector". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved July 25, 2012.
  123. ^ Social Lending Network, accessed September 21, 2010
  124. ^ a b Person-to-person lending online gathers steam Associated Press, November 27, 2007.
  125. ^ JD Roth (November 15, 2012). "Taking a Peek at Peer-to-Peer Lending". Time Magazine. Retrieved June 27, 2013.
  126. ^ "Christian Peer-to-Peer Lending - Faith Saves". Faith Saves. Retrieved February 24, 2015.
  127. ^ "The Morality of Moneylending: A Short History - The Objective Standard". The Objective Standard. Retrieved 2017-03-28.
  128. ^ - Loan Performance Summary - Independent Loan Analytics courtesy of
  129. ^ Social Lending Network, accessed August. 13, 2012
  130. ^ Gompertz, Simon (June 8, 2012). "Peer-to-peer lending via the internet hits £250m". BBC News. Retrieved August 3, 2012.
  131. ^ Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, Docket: [Case Number: CGC-09-491736](retrieved February 1, 2011)
  132. ^ "Prosper Settles Class Action Lawsuit – Pays 10M US$". July 19, 2013. Retrieved September 28, 2018.
  133. ^ Kota, Ina (June 2007). "Microfinance: Banking for the Poor". Finance and Development. IMF. Retrieved 9 September 2017.
  134. ^ Narang, Sonia (December 10, 2006). "Web-Based Microfinancing". New York Times. Retrieved 9 September 2017.

BondMason is a direct lending (including peer-to-peer lending) investment manager based in Harpenden, England.

Capital Match

Capital Match is a peer-to-peer lending and invoice financing platform for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Southeast Asia. Headquartered in Singapore, it operates an online platform for SMEs to seek funds from investors.


EdAid is a peer-to-peer lending and crowdfunding platform for higher education that allows students to crowdfund their student loans for university from the community at zero interest.


Ezubao (Chinese: e租宝) was a peer-to-peer lending scheme based in the eastern Chinese province of Anhui. It was set up as an online scheme in July 2014, attracted funds of about 50 billion yuan ($7.6 billion) from 900,000 investors, and ceased to trade in December 2015. On 1 February 2016, the scheme was closed down and 21 involved people were arrested. Zhang Min, the president of the parent company, Yucheng Global, told investigators that the company operated as a Ponzi scheme.

Funding Circle

Funding Circle is a peer-to-peer lending marketplace that allows investors to lend money directly to small and medium-sized businesses. Funding Circle was the first website to use the process of peer-to-peer lending for business funding in the UK, and now operates in the UK, US, Germany, and the Netherlands. As of June 2018, Funding Circle has facilitated over £5 billion in loans to small and medium-sized firms. The company is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index.

Funding Societies

Funding Societies is a South-East-Asia based peer-to-peer lending company, headquartered in Singapore. It was the first peer-to-peer lender in Singapore to engage an escrow agency to independently and safely manage investors’ funds.


Harmoney Limited is a New Zealand and Australian peer-to-peer lending service headquartered in Auckland with offices in Sydney. Harmoney operates by connecting individuals who want to borrow with individuals who want to invest. Harmoney provides unsecured personal loans up to $70,000 on a range of terms and competitive interest rates.

Launched in September 2014, Harmoney was the first licensed provider in New Zealand after peer-to-peer lending and crowdfunding were enabled in April 1, 2014 following the passing of new financial legislation in New Zealand.


Landbay is a peer-to-peer lending platform for residential buy-to-let mortgages.


Lendico is a multinational company, operating a peer-to-peer lending platform. The international online marketplace for business and consumer lending was founded in December 2013 by the incubator and venture capitalist, Rocket Internet. After launching in Germany, the company expanded into Spain, Poland, Austria, South Africa, the Netherlands and Brazil. Using the crowdfunding model, the company based in Berlin, Germany, directly connects investors and private and business borrowers. Lendico is led by Friedrich Hubel and co-founder Clemens Paschke.


LendingCrowd is an online peer-to-peer lending company, based in Edinburgh, Scotland. As the first Scottish based crowdlending firm, LendingCrowd has created a platform that enables investors to support small and medium-sized businesses by lending personal capital through small loans whilst earning a monthly interest payment.


Peerform is a peer-to-peer lending company based in New York City, which matches prime and near-prime qualified borrowers in the United States to accredited high net worth and institutional investors on its online platform. Its algorithm to determine loan eligibility focuses on a variety of factors including but not limited to FICO scores. In January 2011, Peerform raised $1.3 million during an angel funding round. In April 2014, Peerform raised $1.1 million in a seed funding round led by Corporest Development, a European investment firm.


RateSetter is a British peer-to-peer lending company based in Bishopsgate, London. The company is known for having introduced into peer-to-peer lending the concept of a "Provision Fund" – an internal fund which aims to help lenders manage the risk of borrower default. Launched in October 2010, the company has matched more than £2.5bn in loans and has over 500,000 investors and borrowers. is a Leeds-based peer-to-peer lending platform focusing on finance for small and medium businesses. The company was launched in 2012 by Daniel Rajkumar. The first loans were completed in February 2013.


Unbolted is a UK based online personal asset-based peer-to-peer lending platform, where individuals can borrow from other individuals by using high value personal assets such as luxury watches, cars, fine arts, antiques, jewellery and commodities such as gold. The company started trading in November 2014 and has its offices in London.

Virgin Money Australia

Virgin Money Australia is an Australian financial services company owned by Bank of Queensland, and has 150,000 customers.

Virgin Money US

Virgin Money US (formerly CircleLending) was a peer-to-peer loans and loan-servicing company which was for a short time part of Virgin Money.


Wisr (ASX: WZR) is an Australian marketplace lender offering peer to peer lending services. It is known for being the first company of its type to be publicly listed in Australia. In March 2018, DirectMoney launched a major company re brand to Wisr following its official name change from DirectMoney.


Zencap is a German company, operating a peer-to-peer lending platform, which allows private savers to lend money directly to small and medium sized businesses in Germany, Spain, and the Netherlands. Using the crowdfunding model, the company based in Berlin, Germany aims to create a direct link between private lenders and small businesses seeking loans. As of December 2014, Zencap had facilitated 5 million Euro in loans to small and medium sized firms.In October 2015, the company was merged with Funding Circle, being active on UK and US.


Zopa is a UK online personal finance peer-to-peer lending company founded in 2004. It launched in the UK in March 2005. Zopa was the first peer-to-peer lending company.

Peer-to-peer lending

This page is based on a Wikipedia article written by authors (here).
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.