List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 386

This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 386 of the United States Reports:

  • Miller v. Pate, 386 U.S. 1 (1967)
  • Florida East Coast R. Co. v. United States, 386 U.S. 8 (1967) (per curiam)
  • D'Amico v. Pennsylvania, 386 U.S. 8 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Woodington v. Wisconsin, 386 U.S. 9 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Weiss v. Gardner, 386 U.S. 9 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Fenster v. Leary, 386 U.S. 10 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Risch v. Risch, 386 U.S. 10 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Stoneham v. Texas, 386 U.S. 11 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Beer v. Attorney General of Cal., 386 U.S. 11 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Milani v. Illinois, 386 U.S. 12 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Dale v. California, 386 U.S. 12 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Allison v. United States, 386 U.S. 13 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Holmes v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San Franciscov, 386 U.S. 13 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Rundle v. Johnson, 386 U.S. 14 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Zuckerman v. Greason, 386 U.S. 15 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Barlow v. Texas, 386 U.S. 16 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Kaye v. Co-ordinating Comm. on Discipline of Assn. of Bar of City of New York, 386 U.S. 17 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 (1967)
  • Cooper v. California, 386 U.S. 58 (1967)
  • Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (1967)
  • Kilgarlin v. Hill, 386 U.S. 120 (1967) (per curiam)
  • MacDonald v. California, 386 U.S. 127 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Kimbro v. Heer, 386 U.S. 128 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Cascade Natural Gas Corp. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co., 386 U.S. 129 (1967)
  • Levin v. Mississippi River Fuel Corp., 386 U.S. 162 (1967)
  • Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171 (1967)
  • Shell Oil Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal., 386 U.S. 211 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Bogart v. Reagan, 386 U.S. 211 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Phillips v. California, 386 U.S. 212 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Klopfer v. North Carolina, 386 U.S. 213 (1967)
  • FTC v. Jantzen, Inc., 386 U.S. 228 (1967)
  • FPC v. United Gas Pipe Line Co., 386 U.S. 237 (1967)
  • Swenson v. Bosler, 386 U.S. 258 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Hester v. Swenson, 386 U.S. 261 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Young v. United States Board of Parole, 386 U.S. 261 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Alterman Transport Lines, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of Tenn., 386 U.S. 262 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Hollis v. California, 386 U.S. 262 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Ricks v. California, 386 U.S. 263 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Fontaine v. California, 386 U.S. 263 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Haendiges v. Ford, 386 U.S. 264 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 264 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Tettamble v. Missouri, 386 U.S. 265 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Hudgins v. California, 386 U.S. 265 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Ford v. California, 386 U.S. 266 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Nielsen v. Nebraska State Bar Assn., 386 U.S. 266 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Wheaton v. California, 386 U.S. 267 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Wackenhut Corp. v. Aponte, 386 U.S. 268 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Galveston v. United States, 386 U.S. 269 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Louisiana v. United States, 386 U.S. 270 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Daugherty v. California, 386 U.S. 271 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Garner v. California, 386 U.S. 272 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Erb v. California, 386 U.S. 273 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Cotter v. California, 386 U.S. 274 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Propp v. California, 386 U.S. 275 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Otwell v. California, 386 U.S. 276 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Shaw v. California, 386 U.S. 277 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Boyden v. California, 386 U.S. 278 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Roy v. California, 386 U.S. 279 (1967) (per curiam)
  • McClellan v. California, 386 U.S. 280 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Davis v. California, 386 U.S. 281 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Adams v. California, 386 U.S. 282 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Michael v. California, 386 U.S. 283 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Deckard v. Warden, Mo. Penitentiary, 386 U.S. 284 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Beattie v. California, 386 U.S. 285 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Garrison v. California, 386 U.S. 286 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Commissioner v. Stidger, 386 U.S. 287 (1967)
  • McCray v. Illinois, 386 U.S. 300 (1967)
  • Neely v. Martin K. Eby Constr. Co., 386 U.S. 317 (1967)
  • O'Brien v. United States, 386 U.S. 345 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Gulf-Canal Lines, Inc. v. United States, 386 U.S. 348 (1967) (per curiam)
  • New York v. United States, 386 U.S. 349 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Arden Farms Co. v. State Dept. of Agriculture, 386 U.S. 350 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Railroad Transfer Service, Inc. v. Chicago, 386 U.S. 351 (1967)
  • United States v. First City Nat. Bank of Houston, 386 U.S. 361 (1967)
  • Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. United States, 386 U.S. 372 (1967)
  • Bostick v. South Carolina, 386 U.S. 479 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Colonial Refrigerated Transp., Inc. v. United States, 386 U.S. 480 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Rogers v. City and County of Denver, 386 U.S. 480 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Berman v. New York City Bd. of Elections, 386 U.S. 481 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Shannon v. Sequeechi, 386 U.S. 481 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Cross v. Palo Alto-Mountain View Municipal Court, 386 U.S. 482 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Mangus v. A. C. E. Freight, Inc., 386 U.S. 482 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Connor v. Johnson, 386 U.S. 483 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Honda v. Clark, 386 U.S. 484 (1967)
  • Crown Coat Front Co. v. United States, 386 U.S. 503 (1967)
  • State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Tashire, 386 U.S. 523 (1967)
  • Nowakowski v. Maroney, 386 U.S. 542 (1967) (per curiam)
  • D'Amico v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 386 U.S. 544 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Florida East Coast R. Co. v. United States, 386 U.S. 544 (1967)
  • Cross v. California, 386 U.S. 546 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Young v. Director, U.S. Bureau of Prisons, 386 U.S. 546 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967)
  • FTC v. Procter & Gamble Co., 386 U.S. 568 (1967)
  • Specht v. Patterson, 386 U.S. 605 (1967)
  • National Woodwork Mfrs. Assn. v. NLRB, 386 U.S. 612 (1967)
  • Houston Insulation Contractors Assn. v. NLRB, 386 U.S. 664 (1967)
  • Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham, 386 U.S. 670 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Laverne v. Laurel Hollow, 386 U.S. 682 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Walker v. Arkansas, 386 U.S. 682 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Stewart v. Industrial Comm'n of Ill., 386 U.S. 683 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Dacey v. Grievance Comm. of Bar of Fairfield Cty., 386 U.S. 683 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Miller Brewing Co. v. Jones, 386 U.S. 684 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Utah Pie Co. v. Continental Baking Co., 386 U.S. 685 (1967)
  • Clewis v. Texas, 386 U.S. 707 (1967)
  • Prohibition Party of Mich. v. Hare, 386 U.S. 713 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Arnold v. Virginia, 386 U.S. 713 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 386 U.S. 714 (1967)
  • Waldron v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc., 386 U.S. 724 (1967)
  • Jackson v. Lykes Bros. S. S. Co., 386 U.S. 731 (1967)
  • Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
  • Entsminger v. Iowa, 386 U.S. 748 (1967)
  • National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of Revenue of Ill., 386 U.S. 753 (1967)
  • Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Turner v. New York, 386 U.S. 773 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Oscar Gruss & Son v. United States, 386 U.S. 776 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Armored Carrier Corp. v. United States, 386 U.S. 778 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc. v. City of New York, 386 U.S. 778 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Callender v. New York, 386 U.S. 779 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Laverne v. Piranesi Imports, Inc., 386 U.S. 779 (1967) (per curiam)
  • Montieth v. Oregon, 386 U.S. 780 (1967) (per curiam)

External links

Klopfer v. North Carolina

Klopfer v. North Carolina, 386 U.S. 213 (1967), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court involving the application of the Speedy Trial Clause of the United States Constitution in state court proceedings. The Sixth Amendment in the Bill of Rights states that in criminal prosecutions "...the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy trial" In this case, a defendant was tried for trespassing and the initial jury could not reach a verdict. The prosecutor neither dismissed nor reinstated the case but used an unusual procedure to leave it open, potentially indefinitely. Klopfer argued that this denied him his right to a speedy trial. In deciding in his favor, the Supreme Court incorporated the speedy trial protections of the Sixth Amendment against the states.

Redrup v. New York

Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767 (1967), was a May 8, 1967 ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States, widely regarded as the end of American censorship of written fiction. Robert Redrup was a Times Square newsstand clerk who sold two of William Hamling's Greenleaf Classics paperback pulp sex novels, Lust Pool and Shame Agent, to a plainclothes police officer. He was tried and convicted in 1965.

With financial backing from Hamling, Redrup appealed his case to the Supreme Court where his conviction was overturned by 7-2. The court's final ruling affirmed that written materials that were neither sold to minors nor foisted on unwilling audiences were constitutionally protected, thereby de facto ending American censorship of written material. After this decision, the Supreme Court systematically and summarily reversed, without further opinion, scores of obscenity rulings involving paperback sex books.

This page is based on a Wikipedia article written by authors (here).
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.