Energy in the United States

The United States was the second-largest energy consumer in 2010 after China.[2] The country is ranked seventh in energy consumption per capita after Canada and several small nations.[3][4] Not included is the significant amount of energy used overseas in the production of retail and industrial goods consumed in the United States.

Most of this energy comes from fossil fuels: in 2010, data showed that 25% of the nation's energy originates from petroleum, 22% from coal, and 22% from natural gas. Nuclear energy supplied 8.4% and renewable energy supplied 8%,[5] mainly from hydroelectric dams and biomass; however, this also includes other renewable sources like wind, geothermal, and solar.[6] As of 2006, energy consumption had increased more rapidly than domestic energy production over the last 50 years in the nation (when they were roughly equal). This difference was largely met through imports.[7]

According to the Energy Information Administration's statistics, the per-capita energy consumption in the US has been somewhat consistent from the 1970s to the present time. The average was about 334 million British thermal units [BTU] (352 GJ) per person from 1980 to 2010. One explanation suggested that the energy required to increase the nation's consumption of manufactured equipment, cars, and other goods has been shifted to other countries producing and transporting those goods to the US with a corresponding shift of green house gases and pollution. In comparison, the world average increased from 63.7 to 75 million BTU (67.2 to 79.1 GJ) per person between 1980 and 2008.

Sergeant Major oil well - Evanson Place - Arnegard North Dakota - 2013-07-04 (9287570005)
Pumping rig at the Sergeant Major well in McKenzie County, North Dakota

United States total primary energy consumption by fuel in 2017[1]

  Petroleum (37%)
  Natural gas (29%)
  Coal (14%)
  Nuclear (9%)
  Renewable energy (11%)


History of energy consumption in the United States
US energy consumption by source, 1776–2016. Vertical axis is in quadrillion BTU.

From its founding until the late 19th century, the United States was a largely agrarian country with abundant forests. During this period, energy consumption overwhelmingly focused on readily available firewood. Rapid industrialization of the economy, urbanization, and the growth of railroads led to increased use of coal, and by 1885 it had eclipsed wood as the nation's primary energy source.

Coal remained dominant for the next seven decades, but by 1950, it was surpassed in turn by both petroleum and natural gas. The 1973 oil embargo precipitated an energy crisis in the United States.[8][9] In 2007, coal consumption was the highest it has ever been, with it mostly being used to generate electricity.[10] Natural gas has replaced coal as the preferred source of heating in homes, businesses, and industrial furnaces, which burns cleaner and is easier to transport.

Although total energy use increased by approximately a factor of 50 between 1850 and 2000, energy use per capita increased only by a factor of four. As of 2009, United States per-capita energy use had declined to 7.075 tonnes of oil equivalent (296.2 GJ), 12% less than 2000, and in 2010, to levels not seen since the 1960s.[11] At the beginning of the 20th century, petroleum was a minor resource used to manufacture lubricants and fuel for kerosene and oil lamps. One hundred years later it had become the preeminent energy source for the United States and the rest of the world. This rise closely paralleled the emergence of the automobile as a major force in American culture and the economy.

While petroleum is also used as a source for plastics and other chemicals, and powers various industrial processes, today two-thirds of oil consumption in the US is in the form of its derived transportation fuels.[12] Oil's unique qualities for transportation fuels in terms of energy content, cost of production, and speed of refueling all contributed to it being used over other fuels.

In June 2010, the American Energy Innovation Council, a group which includes Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft; Jeffrey R. Immelt, chief executive of General Electric; and John Doerr,[13] has urged the government to more than triple spending on energy research and development—to $16 billion a year. Gates endorsed the administration's goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 80% by 2050, but said that was not possible with today's technology or politicism. He said that the only way to find such disruptive new technology was to pour large sums of money at the problem. The group notes that the federal government spends less than $5 billion a year on energy research and development, not counting one-time stimulus projects. About $30 billion is spent annually on health research and more than $80 billion on military research and development. They advocate for a jump in spending on basic energy research.[14]


Energy in the United States[15]
Prim. energy
CO2 emission
2004 294.0 97,380 68,706 29,916 14,116 5,800
2007 302.1 97,970 69,718 29,891 14,807 5,769
2008 304.5 95,616 71,428 26,564 14,962 5,596
2009 307.5 90,558 70,607 23,404 14,263 5,195
2010 310.1 92,794 72,202 22,338 14,915 5,369
2012 312.0 91,742 74,725 19,159 14,857 5,287
2012R 314.3 89,622 75,632 15,696 14,648 5,074
2013 316.5 91,624 78,754 12,910 14,796 5,120
Change 2004–2010 5.5% -4.7% 5.1% -25.3% 5.7% -7.4%
Mtoe = 41,868 TJ>, Prim. energy includes energy losses that are 2/3 for nuclear power[16]

2012R = CO2 calculation criteria changed, numbers updated

US primary energy consumption by source and sector (2017)[17]
Supply sources Percent of source Demand sectors Percent of sector
72% Transportation
23% Industrial
5% Residential and commercial
1% Electric power
92% Petroleum
3% Natural gas
5% Renewable energy
Natural gas
3% Transportation
35% Industrial
28% Residential and commercial
34% Electric power
38% Petroleum
45% Natural gas
5% Coal
12% Renewable energy
9% Industrial
<1% Residential and commercial
91% Electric power
Residential and commercial
16% Petroleum
76% Natural gas
<1% Coal
8% Renewable energy
Renewable energy
13% Transportation
23% Industrial
7% Residential and commercial
57% Electric power
Electric power
1% Petroleum
26% Natural gas
34% Coal
17% Renewable energy
23% Nuclear electric power
Nuclear electric power
100% Electric power

Note: Sum of components may not equal 100% due to independent rounding.

Primary energy consumption

Energy Flow US 2017
US energy flow, 2017. A quad is 1015 BTU, or 1.055 × 1018 joules (1.055 EJ). Note the breakdown of useful and waste energy in each sector (dark vs. light grey) due to the nature of heat engines, which cannot convert all thermal energy into useful work and consequently lose a portion of their heat to the environment.
U.S. primary energy consumption by source and sector, 2017
US primary energy consumption by source and sector, 2017. From the US Energy Information Administration (Department of Energy).

Primary energy use in the United States was 90,558 petajoules [PJ] (25,155 TWh) or about 294,480 megajoules [MJ] (81,800 kWh) per person in 2009. Primary energy use was 3,960 PJ (1,100 TWh) less in the United States than in China in 2009. The share of energy import was 26% of the primary energy use. The energy import declined about 22% and the annual CO2 emissions about 10% in 2009 compared to 2004.[18]

Total primary energy consumption (Mtoe)[19]
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
1,914 1,929.6 1,967.5 2,000.9 2,041.3 2,067.3 2,118.4 2,140.7 2,167.2 2,215.9 2,279.6
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2010–2011 CAGR 2001-11
2,235.8 2,270.6 2,265.2 2,311 2,324.6 2,304.5 2,340.4 2,301.4 2,201.4 2,249 2,225 -1.1% -0.04%

Energy consumption by source

Energy consumption by source in 2006 (PJ)
Fuel type United States[20] World[21]
Oil 42,156 181,188
Gas 23,400 113,940
Coal 23,760 134,568
Hydroelectric 3,024 31,356
Nuclear 8,676 29,304
Geothermal, wind,
solar, wood, waste
3,420 4,968
Total 105,336 498,276


Oil is one of the largest sources of energy in the United States. The United States influences world oil reserves for both growth and development.[22] As the 20th century progressed, petroleum gained increasing importance by providing heating and electricity to the commercial and industrial sectors. Oil was also used in transportation; first for railroads and later for motor vehicles.[23]

As automobiles became more affordable, demand for oil quickly rose. Since the rise of the automobile industry, oil price, demand, and production have all increased as well. Between 1900 and 1980, fuel was directly correlated with Gross National Product (GNP). Furthermore, oil shocks have often coincided with recessions, and the government has responded to oil shocks in several ways.[24] In the 1920s, oil prices were peaking and many commentators believed that oil supplies were running out. Congress was confronted by requests to augment supplies, so a generous depletion allowance was enacted for producers in 1926, which increased investment returns substantially. This change induced additional exploration activity, and subsequently the discovery of large new oil reservoirs.[25]

In the next decade the situation was reversed with prices low and dropping. This resulted in demands for more "orderly" competition and set minimum oil prices. Rather than repealing the previous policies enacted in the 1920s, Congress enacted a price-support system. Similar cycles have occurred in the 1950s and 1970s.[25]


US Natural gas prodxn 1900-2013.tiff
Natural gas production, 1900–2013

Natural gas was the largest source of energy production in the United States in 2016, representing 33% of all energy produced in the country.[26] Natural gas has been the largest source of electrical generation in the United States since July 2015.

The United States has been the world's largest producer of natural gas since 2009, when it surpassed Russia. US natural gas production achieved new record highs for each year from 2011 through 2015. Marketed natural gas production in 2015 was 28.8 trillion cubic feet (820 billion cubic metres), a 5.4% increase over 2014, and a 52% increase over the production of 18.9 trillion cu ft (540 billion m3) per day in 2005.[27]

Because of the greater supply, consumer prices for natural gas are significantly lower in the United States than in Europe and Japan.[28] The low price of natural gas, together with its smaller carbon footprint compared to coal, has encouraged a rapid growth in electricity generated from natural gas.

Between 2005 and 2014, US production of natural gas liquids (NGLs) increased 70%, from 1.74 million barrels of oil equivalent (10.6 PJ) per day in 2005 to 2.96 million barrels of oil equivalent (18.1 PJ) per day in 2014. The US has been the world's leading producer of natural gas liquids since 2010, when US NGL production passed that of Saudi Arabia.

Although the United States leads the world in natural gas production, it is only fifth in proved reserves of natural gas, behind Russia, Iran, Qatar, and Turkmenistan.


Generation of electricity is the largest user of coal, although its use is in decline. About 50% of electric power was produced by coal in 2005, declining to 30% in 2016.[29]:1 Electric utilities buy more than 90% of the coal consumed in the United States.[30]

The United States is a net exporter of coal. Coal exports, for which Europe is the largest customer, peaked in 2012 and have declined since. In 2015, the US exported 7.0% of mined coal.[31]

Coal has been used to generate electricity in the United States since an Edison plant was built in New York City in 1882.[32] The first AC power station was opened by General Electric in Ehrenfeld, Pennsylvania in 1902, servicing the Webster Coal and Coke Company.[32] By the mid-20th century, coal had become the leading fuel for generating electricity in the US. The long, steady rise of coal-fired generation of electricity shifted to a decline after 2007. The decline has been linked to the increased availability of natural gas, decreased consumption,[33] renewable electricity, and more stringent environmental regulations. The Environmental Protection Agency has advanced restrictions on coal plants to counteract mercury pollution, smog, and global warming.

Other renewables

Final energy consumption

Consumption by sector

The US Department of Energy tracks national energy consumption in four broad sectors: industrial, transportation, residential, and commercial. The industrial sector has long been the country's largest energy user, currently representing about 33% of the total. Next in importance is the transportation sector followed by the residential and commercial sectors.

Sector summary
Sector name Description Major uses[34][35][36]
Industrial Facilities and equipment used for producing and processing goods. 22% chemical production
16% petroleum refining
14% metal smelting/refining
Transportation Vehicles which transport people/goods on ground, air, or water. 61% gasoline fuel
21% diesel fuel
12% aviation
Residential Living quarters for private households. 32% space heating
13% water heating
12% lighting
11% air conditioning
8% refrigeration
5% electronics
5% wet-clean (mostly clothes dryers)
Commercial Service-providing facilities and equipment (businesses, government, other institutions). 25% lighting
13% heating
11% cooling
6% refrigeration
6% water heating
6% ventilation
6% electronics

Regional variation

Residential energy consumption per capita by state[37]
US household energy usage
Electricity use kwh per customer 2000-05
Average annual residential electricity usage by city, 2000–2005. Measured in kWh per customer.[38]

Household energy use varies significantly across the United States. An average home in the Pacific region (consisting of California, Oregon, and Washington) consumes 35% less energy than a home in the South Central region. Some of the regional differences can be explained by climate. The heavily populated coastal areas of the Pacific states experience generally mild winters and summers, reducing the need for both home heating and air conditioning. The warm, humid climates of the South Central and South Atlantic regions lead to higher electricity usage, while the cold winters experienced in the Northeast and North Central regions result in much higher consumption of natural gas and heating oil. The state with the lowest per-capita energy use is New York, at 205 million BTU (216 GJ) per year,[39] and the highest is Wyoming, at slightly over 1 billion BTU (1,100 GJ) per year.[40]

Other regional differences stem from energy efficiency measures taken at the local and state levels. California has some of the strictest environmental laws and building codes in the country, leading its per-household energy consumption to be lower than all other states except Hawaii.

The land-use decisions of cities and towns also explain some of the regional differences in energy use. Townhouses are more energy efficient than single-family homes because less heat, for example, is wasted per person. Similarly, areas with more homes in a compact neighborhood encourage walking, biking and transit, thereby reducing transportation energy use. A 2011 US EPA study found that multi-family homes in urban neighborhoods, with well-insulated buildings and fuel-efficient cars, can save more than 2/3 of the energy used by conventionally built single-family houses in suburban areas (with standard cars).[41]


Power plants map
Power plants map

The United States is the world's second largest producer and consumer of electricity.[42] It consumes about 20%[43] of the world's electricity supply. This section provides a summary of the consumption and generation of the nation's electric industry, based on data mined from US DOE Energy Information Administration/Electric Power Annual 2017 files.[44] Data was obtained from the most recent DOE Energy Information Agency (EIA) files. Consumption is detailed from the residential, commercial, industrial, and other user communities. Generation is detailed for the major fuel sources of coal, natural gas, nuclear, petroleum, hydro, and the other renewables of wind, wood, other biomass, geothermal, and solar. Changes to the electrical energy fuel mix and other trends are identified. Progress in wind and solar contributing to the energy mix are addressed. Expected changes in the generation environment during the next 5 years are discussed.


Ten Year Comsumption by User Community
Ten-year consumption by user community, 2007–2017[45]
2017 Electric Energy Consumption Profile
2017 electric energy consumption profile
Customers 2017
Residential, commercial and industrial US customers
US Per Capita Consumption of Electric Energy
US per-capita consumption
Average Residential Consumption by State 2017
2017 residential consumption by state

Electricity consumption data in this section is based upon data mined from US DOE Energy Information Administration/Electric Power Annual 2017 files[46] In 2017, the total US consumption of electricity was 4,090.6 terawatt-hours [TWh] (14,726 PJ). Consumption was essentially down from 2016 with a reduction of 45.5 TWh (164 PJ) or 1.0% drop. This is broken down as:

  • Residential customers (132.58 million) directly consumed 1,378.6 TWh (4,963 PJ) or 37.03% of the total. This was down 32.5 TWh (117 PJ) (-2.3%) from 2016. An average residential customer used 866.55 kWh (3,119.6 MJ) per month, and with the average US residential cost of $0.1289/kWh ($0.0358/MJ), the average monthly electrical bill would be $111.70, down slightly from 2016.[47]
  • Commercial customers (18.359 million) directly consumed 1,352.9 TWh (4,870 PJ) or 36.34% of the total. This was less (14.31 TWh or 51.5 PJ) than in 2016, even though there were over 211,000 new customers. An average commercial customer used 6,141 kWh (22,110 MJ) per month, and with the average US commercial electric cost of $0.1066/kWh ($0.0296/MJ), the average monthly electrical bill would be $654.60, down slightly from 2016.[48]
  • Industrial customers (about 840,300; up 2,200 in 2016) directly consumed 984.3 TWh (3,543 PJ) or 26.44% of the total. This was a little more (7.6 TWh or 27 PJ) than in 2016 (+0.8%).
  • Transportation customers (86) directly consumed 7.52 TWh (27.1 PJ) or 0.20% of the total. This was a little higher (0.2 TWh or 0.72 PJ) than in 2016.
  • System loss throughout the total electrical grid infrastructure by direct use of the suppliers was 141.1 TWh or 508 PJ,[49], and transmission, other system losses, and unaccounted loads (226.1 TWh or 814 PJ) amounted to 367.2 TWh (1,322 PJ) or 9% of the total, which is down by 0.1% from 2016. Thus, the US electric distribution system is 91% efficient, and its efficiency has improved slightly over the last year.

In addition to consumption from the electrical grid, the US consumers consumed an estimated additional 23.99 TWh (86.4 PJ) from small-scale solar systems. This will be included in the per-capita data below.

Electricity consumption per capita is based upon data mined from US DOE Energy Information Administration/Electric Power Annual 2017 files[50] Population[51] data is from Demographics of the United States. Per-capita consumption in 2017 is 12,632 kWh (45,480 MJ). This is down 229 kWh (820 MJ) from 2016, down 7.5% from a decade ago, and down 8.0% from its peak in 2007. The following table shows the yearly US per-capita consumption from 2013 to 2017.

Electricity per capita in the United States, 2013–2017
Year Population (Millions) Per-capita consumption (kWh)
2017 325,719 12,632
2016 323,128 12,861
2015 320,897 12,915
2014 318,857 13,005
2013 316,129 13,010

A profile of the electric energy consumption[52] for 2017 is shown in the following graph. The February minimum of 295 TWh (1,060 PJ) to the July peak of 410 TWh (1,500 PJ) shows the monthly range of consumption variations.


Ten Electric Generation Profile 2018
Profile of electric energy by fuel source, 2007–2017

The United States has an installed summer electricity generation capacity of 1,072.46 GW in 2017, down 1.8 GW from 2016.[53] The US electricity generation was 4,034.3 TWh (14,523 PJ) in 2017.[54] The US's net imports were 56.31 TWh (202.7 PJ), for a total of 4,090.6 TWh (14,726 PJ) of electrical energy use.[55] Electrical energy generated from coal was 1,205.84 TWh or 4,341.0 PJ (29.48%); natural and other gases, 1,3908.89 TWh (32.0%); nuclear, 804.95 TWh or 2,897.8 PJ (19.68%); hydro, 300.33 TWh or 1,081.2 PJ (7.34%); Renewables (other than hydro), 386.28 TWh or 1,390.6 PJ (9.45%); imports less exports, 56.31 TWh or 202.7 PJ (1.38%); petroleum, 21.39 TWh or 77.0 PJ (0.52%); and miscellaneous (including pumped storage), 6.59 TWh or 23.7 PJ (0.16%). The US's renewable sources (hydro reported separately) are wind, 254.30 TWh or 915.5 PJ (6.22%); wood, 41.15 TWh or 148.1 PJ (1.01%); other biomass, 21.61 TWh or 77.8 PJ (0.53% ); geothermal, 15.93 TWh or 57.3 PJ (0.39%) and solar, 53.29 TWh or 191.8 PJ (1.3%).[44] Small-scale solar is estimated to have produced an additional 23.99 TWh (86.4 PJ). Natural gas electricity generation exceeded generation from coal for the first time in 2016 and continued in 2017.

The following tables summarize the electrical energy generated by fuel source for the United States. Data from Electric Power Annual 2017[44] was used throughout this section.

Electricity generation in the United States in 2017[56][57]
Power source Generators Summer capacity (GW) % of total capacity Capacity factor Annual energy (TWh) % of total US
Coal 789 256.55 23.92 0.537 1,205.84 29.48
Natural gas 5,973 458.39 42.74 0.326 1308.89 32.00
Nuclear 99 99.63 9.29 0.922 804.95 19.68
Hydro 4,062 79.79 7.44 0.430 300.33 7.34
Other renewables 6,600 131.01 12.22 0.337 386.28 9.44
Petroleum 3,575 21.39 1.99 0.114 21.39 0.52
Other 186 2.89 0.27 0.517 13.09 0.32
Storage 153 22.81 2.13 -0.033 -6.50 -0.16
Net imports 56.31 1.38
Total 21,437 1072.46 100 0.435 4,090.58 100
Ten Year Generation Renewables 2018
US electric energy renewables, 2007–2017
Electric production by renewables in 2017[58]
Power source Summer capacity (GW) % of renewable capacity % of total capacity Capacity factor Total generation (TWh) % of renewable energy % of total
Hydro 79.79 37.85 7.44 0.430 300.33 43.74 7.44
Wind 87.6 41.56 8.17 0.331 254.30 37.04 6.30
Biomass 13.96 6.62 1.30 0.513 62.76 9.14 1.56
Solar 26.97 12.79 2.51 0.226 53.29 7.76 1.32
Geothermal 2.48 1.18 0.23 0.733 15.93 2.32 0.39
Total 210.8 100.00 19.66 0.372 686.61 100.00 17.02

Note: Biomass includes wood and wood derived fuel, landfill gas, biogenic municipal solid waste, and other waste biomass.

Electricity generation by source

Electricity generation by type Ten years of electric generation 2018/2017 total US electric generation
Electricity generation by source (TWh per year)[54][59]
Year Fossil fuel Nuclear Renewable Misc5 Total6
Coal Oil Gas1 Subtotal Hydro2 Geothermal Solar3 Wind Wood Bio4
20187 1,146.39 24.57 1,480.20 2,651.17 807.08 291.72 16.73 66.60 274.95 41.41 21.35 712.77 6.79 4,177.81
Proportion 20187 27.44% 0.59% 35.43% 63.46% 19.32% 6.98% 0.40% 1.59% 6.58% 0.99% 0.51% 17.06% 0.16% 100.0%
2017 1,205.84 21.39 1,308.89 2,536.12 804.95 300.33 15.93 53.29 254.30 41.15 21.61 686.61 62.90 4,090.58
Proportion 2017 29.48% 0.52% 32.00% 62.00% 19.68% 7.34% 0.39% 1.30% 6.22% 1.01% 0.53% 16.79% 1.54% 100.0%
2016 1,239.15 24.20 1,391.11 2,654.47 805.69 267.81 15.83 36.05 226.99 40.95 21.81 609.45 67.49 4,137.10
Proportion 2016 29.95% 0.59% 33.63% 64.16% 19.47% 6.47% 0.38% 0.87% 5.49% 0.99% 0.53% 14.73% 1.63% 100.0%
2015 1,352.40 28.25 1,346.60 2,727.25 797.18 249.08 15.92 24.89 190.72 41.93 21.70 544.24 75.61 4,144.27
Proportion 2015 32.63% 0.68% 32.49% 65.81% 19.24% 6.01% 0.38% 0.60% 4.6% 01.01% 0.52% 13.13% 1.82% 100.0%
2014 1,581.71 30.23 1,138.63 2,750.57 797.17 259.37 15.88 17.69 181.655 42.34 21.65 538.58 60.50 4,146.2
2013 1,581.12 27.16 1,137.69 2,745.97 789.02 268.57 15.78 9.04 167.84 40 20.83 522.07 55.64 4,112.7
2012 1,514.04 23.19 1,237.79 2,775.02 769.33 276.24 15.56 4.33 140.82 37.8 19.82 494.57 56.1 4095
2011 1,733.4 30.2 1,025.3 2,788.9 790.2 319.4 15.3 1.82 120.2 37.4 19.2 513.32 46 4138.4
2010 1,847.3 37.1 999.0 2,883.4 807.0 260.2 15.2 1.21 94.7 37.2 18.9 427.4 33.3 4,151.0
Proportion 2010 44.5% 0.9% 24.1% 69.5% 19.4% 6.3% 0.37% 0.029% 2.3% 0.9% 0.5% 10.3% 0.8% 100.0%
2009 1,755.9 38.9 931.6 2,726.5 798.9 273.4 15.0 0.89 73.9 36.1 18.4 417.7 41.4 3,984.4
2008 1,985.8 46.2 894.7 2,926.7 806.2 254.8 14.8 0.86 55.4 37.3 17.7 380.9 38.3 4,152.2
2007 2,016.5 65.7 910.0 2,992.2 806.4 247.5 14.6 0.61 34.5 39.0 16.5 352.7 36.6 4,188.0
2000 1,966 111 615 2,692 754 260 14 0.49 5.6 37.6 23 318.7 38.6 3,836
Proportion 2000 51.3% 2.9% 16.0% 70.2% 19.7% 7.2% 0.37% 0.013% 0.15% 1.0% 0.6% 9.3% 0.9% 100.0%
1999 1,881 118 57l 2,570 728 319.5 14.8 0.50 4.5 37 22.6 392.8 55 3,723.8

Notes: 1 Gas includes natural gas and other gases. 2 Hydro excludes pumped storage (not an energy source, used by all sources, other than hydro). 3 Solar includes photovoltaics and thermal. 4 Bio other includes waste, landfill gas, and other. 5 Misc. includes misc. generation, pumped storage, and net imports. 6 Total includes net imports. 7 2018 data is from Electric Power Monthly and does not include import-export data.[59]

2018 & 2017 Profile of US Electric Energy Generation from Coal


2018 & 2017 Profile of US Electric Energy Generation from Petroleum


2018 & 2017 Profile of US Electric Energy Generation from Natural and Other Gasses

Natural and other gases

2018 & 2017 Profile of US Electric Energy Generation from Nuclear


2017 Profile of US Electric Energy Generation by all Renewables


2018 & 2017 Electric Energy Generation from Misc Sources



State electric characteristics

Individual states have very diverse electric generation systems, and their new initiatives to expand their generation base are equally diverse. Coupled with consumption disparages, it leads to a mix of "have" and "have not" electric energy states. Using the data from the US DOE Energy Information Administration/Electric Power Annual 2017 files.[60] Data was obtained from the most recent DOE Energy Information Agency (EIA) full year files.[61] Full use of the excellent EIA data browser[62] permits easy access to the plethora of data available.

State electric generation

2017 Electric Generation by State by Fuel Source

2017 electric generation by state by fuel source

2017 State Electric Energy Generation

Electric energy generation by state 2017

Top ten states by fuel source

2017 Top Ten States for Electric Generation by Coal

Top ten coal states

Top Ten States for Electric Energy generation by Natural Gas

Top ten gas states

2017 Top Ten States for Nuclear Generation

2017 top ten nuclear states

2017 Top Ten Hydro Power States

2017 top ten hydro states

Top Ten Wind States

Top ten wind states

2017 Top Ten Solar States

2017 top ten solar states

Importing states

The following table, derived from data mined from Electric Power Annual[63][64], identifies those states which must import electrical energy from neighboring states to meet their consumption needs. Each state's total electric generation for 2017 is compared with the state's consumption, and its share of the system loss and the difference between the generated electric energy and its total consumption (including its share of the system loss) is the amount of energy it imports. For Hawaii, total consumption equals generated energy. For the other states, multiplying their direct consumption by 1.098744069 (4080770384/3714031773), results in the US's supply (including net imports) being equal to its total consumption.

2017 states importing electricity
Net-importer states in 2017[63][64]
State Consumption Generation State imports
Retail sales (MWh) Total usage (MWh) MWh % 2017 % 2016 Change
CA 257,267,937 282671620 206,146,392 76525228 37.12% 30.27%
OH 146,643,831 161124040 119,552,140 41571900 34.77% 28.19%
VA 111,529,732 122542632 90,417,351 32125281 35.53% 25.04%
NY 144,992,433 159309576 128,065,103 31244473 24.40% 17.30%
MD 59,303,885 65159792 34,104,239 31055553 91.06% 44.91%
TN 97,239,885 106841747 79,046,397 27795350 35.16% 28.39%
MA 52,513,321 57698700 32,204,364 25494336 79.16% 45.66%
GA 133,456,620 146634670 127,455,376 19179294 15.05% 12.18%
FL 233,154,549 256177178 238,413,149 17764029 7.45% 8.09%
NC 131,421,319 144398395 128,468,235 15930160 12.40% 11.52%
MN 67,152,580 73783499 58,748,841 15034658 25.59% 18.72%
DC 10,916,446 11994380 66,871 11927509 17836.59% 99.39%
WI 69,079,109 75900261 65,107,103 10793158 16.58% 15.28%
IN 98,965,968 108738270 98,929,818 9808452 9.91% 10.77%
ID 23,793,790 26143286 17,396,024 8747262 50.28% 38.25%
KY 72,634,387 79806602 73,179,196 6627406 9.06% 2.09%
CO 54,830,186 60244342 53,844,006 6400336 11.89% 9.70%
NJ 73,382,940 80629070 75,644,513 4984557 6.59% 6.35%
DE 11,128,603 12227487 7,495,976 4731511 63.12% 29.48%
VT 5,423,662 5959216 2,141,388 3817828 178.29% 68.50%
SD 12,313,675 13529577 10,935,719 2593858 23.72% 13.60%
LA 91,205,935 100211980 97,719,207 2492773 2.55% 6.25%*
NV 36,657,786 40277525 38,201,294 2076231 5.43% 0.10%*
ME 11,213,674 12320958 11,264,280 1056678 9.38% 8.55%
RI 7,384,671 8113863 7,614,941 498922 6.55% 20.66%
AK 6,185,799 6796610 6,497,466 299144 4.60% 5.92%
SUM 2,019,793,723 2,219,235,275 1,808,659,389 410,575,886 *=Export

Exporting states

The following table, derived from data mined from Electric Power Annual,[63][64] identifies those states which generate more electrical energy than they need to meet their consumption needs. They supply those that need additional energy. Each state's total electric generation for 2017 is compared with the state's consumption, and its share of the system loses and the difference between the generated electric energy and its total consumption (including its share of the system losses) is the amount of energy it exports. For Hawaii, total consumption equals generated energy. For the other states, multiplying their direct consumption by 1.098744069 (4080770384/3714031773) results in the US's supply (including net imports) being equal to its total consumption usage. A state exported energy is determined by subtracting the state's total consumption from its generation.

2017 states exporting electricity
Net-exporters states in 2017[63][64]
State Generation Consumption State exports
Retail sales (MWh) Total usage (MWh) MWh % 2017 % 2016 Change
PA 213,639,299 142,990,896 157110399 56,528,900 26.46% 25.69%
AL 139,964,250 86,241,730 94757589 45,206,661 32.30% 31.86%
WV 73,357,080 31,709,019 34840097 38,516,983 52.51% 53.55%
IL 183,591,377 137,196,310 150743632 32,847,745 17.89% 17.25%
WY 46,741,846 16,778,067 18434802 28,307,044 60.56% 60.98%
AZ 105,851,721 77,646,262 85313370 20,538,351 19.40% 20.90%
ND 41,505,074 20,140,426 22129174 19,375,900 46.68% 46.20%
WA 115,912,028 91,948,172 101027509 14,884,519 12.84% 14.32%
MT 28,220,946 14,709,656 16162147 12,058,799 42.73% 44.19%
TX 452,794,463 401,880,374 441563677 11,230,786 2.48% 3.45%
AR 60,775,298 46,085,951 50636665 10,138,633 16.68% 15.97%
NM 33,597,413 23,009,584 25281644 8,315,769 24.75% 23.02%
OR 62,713,747 50,043,816 54985346 7,728,401 12.32% 13.48%
SC 93,080,948 78,096,757 85808349 7,272,599 7.81% 9.77%
OK 73,731,764 60,492,128 66465367 7,266,397 9.86% 13.99%
MS 59,727,637 47,828,787 52551596 7,176,041 12.01% 14.22%
KS 50,933,305 40,287,787 44265967 6,667,338 13.09% 5.72%
NH 17,446,841 10,787,261 11852439 5,594,402 32.07% 37.81%
IA 57,909,566 48,921,997 53752754 4,156,812 7.18% 2.08%
UT 37,411,876 30,589,021 33609505 3,802,371 10.16% 12.97%
CT 34,562,654 28,135,530 30913747 3,648,907 10.56% 12.83%
NE 35,407,047 30,359,007 33356779 2,050,268 5.79% 9.08%
MO 84,607,312 76,461,419 84011531 595,781 0.70% 9.07%*
MI 112,313,501 101,899,093 111961024 352,477 0.31% 2.4%*
HI 9,812,050 9324201 9,812,050 0 0.00% 0.00%
NET IMP 56,314,000
SUM 2,281,923,043 1,703,563,251 1,871,347,158 354,261,885 *=Import

Renewable energy

2018 Profile of US Electric Energy from all Renewables

2018 profile of renewables

2018 & 2017 Profile of US Electric Energy Generation from Hydro


2018 & 2017 Profile of US Electric Energy Generation from Wind


2018 & 2017 Profile of US Electric Energy Generation from Utility Solar


2018 & 2017 Profile of US Electric Energy Generation from Biomass


2018 & 2017 Profile of US Electric Energy Generation from Geothermal


Sources of Total US Renewable Energy
Sources of total United States renewable energy, 2012 (US EIA)
Shepherds Flat Wind Farm 2011
The Shepherds Flat Wind Farm is an 845-megawatt wind farm in the US state of Oregon

Renewable energy in the United States accounted for 13.2% of the domestically produced electricity in 2014,[65] and 11.2% of total energy generation.[66] As of 2014, more than 143,000 people work in the solar industry and 43 states deploy net metering, where energy utilities buy back excess energy generated by solar arrays.[67]

Renewable energy reached a major milestone in the first quarter of 2011, when it contributed 11.7% of total US energy production (2.245 quadrillion BTU or 2.369 EJ of energy), surpassing nuclear energy production (2.125 quadrillion BTU or 2.242 EJ).[68] 2011 was the first year since 1997 that renewables exceeded nuclear in total US energy production.[69]

Hydroelectric power is currently the largest producer of renewable energy in the US. It produced around 6.2% of the nation's total electricity in 2010 which was 60.2% of the total renewable energy in the US.[70] The United States is the fourth largest producer of hydroelectricity in the world after China, Canada, and Brazil. The Grand Coulee Dam is the 5th largest hydroelectric power station in the world.

US wind power's installed capacity now exceeds 65,000 MW and supplies 4% of the nation's electric power.[71][72] Texas is firmly established as the leader in wind power development followed by Iowa and California.[73]

The United States has some of the largest solar farms in the world. Solar Star is a 579-megawatt (MWAC) farm near Rosamond, California.[74] The Desert Sunlight Solar Farm is a 550-megawatt solar power plant in Riverside County, California[75] and the Topaz Solar Farm, a 550 MW photovoltaic power plant, is in San Luis Obispo County, California.[76] The solar thermal SEGS group of plants in the Mojave Desert has a total generating capacity of 354 MW.[77]

The Geysers in Northern California is the largest complex of geothermal energy production in the world.

The development of renewable energy and efficient energy use marks "a new era of energy exploration" in the United States, according to President Barack Obama.[78] Studies suggest that if there is enough political will, it is feasible to supply the whole United States with 100% renewable energy by 2050.[79][80]

Trends and projections

In 2015, electrical energy usage in the United States was 1.6% more than in 2005 and 1% less than the peak in 2007. Per-capita consumption has decreased about 7% since its peak in 2007 and every year since has shown a decrease in individual consumption. Conservation efforts are helping. At least, for the next decade, coal, natural gas, and nuclear will remain the top three fuels for electric energy generation in the USA. Coal will continuously decrease its contribution, with natural gas increasing its contribution. Nuclear will have some downs (decommissionings) and ups (new online plants) but probably remain about constant. Hydro will maintain. Petroleum will continue to decrease in importance. Wind and solar will continue to grow in importance; their combined generation was 5.29% of US electric generation for 2015 or 5.20% of total US consumption.

United States per capita energy use 1650-2010
Per-capita energy use in the United States

From the beginning of the United States until 1973, total energy (including electrical) use increased by about 3% per year, while population increased an average of 2.2% per year. Per-capita energy use from 1730 to 1870 was about 100 million BTU (110 GJ) per person. In the 20th century this increased to around 300 million BTU or 320 GJ (332 million BTU or 350 GJ per person per year in 1981).[81]

In 2001, Vice President Dick Cheney said the US would need "at least 1,300 new power plants over the next 20 years."[82]

Efficiency improvements could cause energy use to drop considerably.

A concentrating solar array (CSP) with thermal storage has a practical capacity factor of 33%[83] and could provide power 24 hours a day. Prior to 2012, in six southwestern states (Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah) the US Bureau of Land Management (BLM) owned nearly 98 million acres or 400,000 square kilometres (an area larger than the state of Montana) that was open to proposals for solar power installations. To streamline consideration of applications, the BLM produced a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS). By the subsequent Record of Decision in October 2012, the BLM withdrew 78% of its land from possible solar development, leaving 19 million acres (77,000 km2) still open to applications for solar installations, an area nearly as large as South Carolina. Of the area left open to solar proposals, the BLM has identified 285,000 acres (115,000 ha) in highly favorable areas it calls Solar Energy Zones.[84] In Spain, with natural gas backups, CSP has reached a capacity factor of 66%, with 75% being a theoretical maximum.[85]

See also


  1. ^ "U.S. Energy Information Administration".
  2. ^ Barr, Robert. "China surpasses US as top energy consumer". Associated Press. Retrieved 16 June 2012.
  3. ^ World Per Capita Total Primary Energy Consumption,1980-2005 Archived October 13, 2006, at the Wayback Machine (MS Excel format)
  4. ^ World Resources Institute "Energy Consumption: Consumption per capita Archived December 12, 2004, at the Wayback Machine" (2001). Nations with higher per-capita consumption are: Qatar, Iceland, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Luxembourg and Canada. Except for Canada, these are small countries with a prominent energy-intensive industry such as oil refining or steelmaking.
  5. ^ See #Fossil-fuel equivalency - these figures are actually closer to 2.8% each.
  6. ^ US Dept. of Energy, "Annual Energy Report" (2010), Energy Flow diagram
  7. ^ Ristinen, Robert, A. Energy and the Environment. Malloy, 2006. Print.
  8. ^ Rocks, Lawrence; Runyon, Richard P. (1972). The Energy Crisis. Retrieved November 6, 2016.
  9. ^ Rocks, Lawrence; Runyon, Richard P. (1972). The Energy Crisis. Retrieved November 6, 2016.
  10. ^ "Annual Coal Report" (PDF). Retrieved 14 October 2017.
  11. ^ "World Development Indicators - Google Public Data Explorer". Retrieved 14 October 2017.
  12. ^ US Dept. of Energy, "Energy in the United States: 1635-2000"
  13. ^ "Who We Are". American Energy Innovation Council. Retrieved 2015-01-06.
  14. ^ Broder, John M. (2010-06-09). "A Call to Triple U.S. Spending on Energy Research". The New York Times.
  15. ^ IEA Key World Energy Statistics Statistics 2015, 2014 (2012R as in November 2015 + 2012 as in March 2014 is comparable to previous years statistical calculation criteria, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2006 IEA October, crude oil p.11, coal p. 13 gas p. 15
  16. ^ Energy in Sweden 2010 Archived October 16, 2013, at the Wayback Machine, Facts and figures, The Swedish Energy Agency, Table 8 Losses in nuclear power stations Table 9 Nuclear power brutto
  17. ^ US Dept. of Energy, "U.S. primary energy consumption by source and sector, 2017" (2017)
  18. ^ IEA Key World Energy Statistics 2011 October 2011
  19. ^ "World Energy Consumption: Map, Figures by Region - Enerdata". Retrieved 14 October 2017.
  20. ^ Energy Information Administration (August 2005). "2004 U. S. Energy Consumption by Energy Source". Retrieved 14 October 2017.
  21. ^ "World Consumption of Primary Energy by Energy Type and Selected Country Groups, 1980-2004". Energy Information Administration. July 31, 2006. Archived from the original (XLS) on 2006-11-09. Retrieved 2007-01-20.
  22. ^ "What role have natural resources played in the politics and economy of the Middle East?". Global Connections. Public Broadcasting System (PBS). Retrieved 22 June 2014.
  23. ^ Hamilton, James. "Historical Oil Shocks" (PDF). Econweb. University of California, San Diego. Retrieved 22 June 2014.
  24. ^ Cleveland, Cutler J.; Costanza, Robert; Hall, Charles A. S.; Kaufmann, Robert. "Energy and the U.S. Economy: A Biophysical Perspective" (PDF). oilcrisis. Science. Retrieved 22 June 2014.
  25. ^ a b Van Doren, Peter. "A Brief History of Energy Regulations" (PDF). downsizinggovernment. CATO Institute. Retrieved 22 June 2014.
  26. ^ US Energy Information Administration,Overview, accessed 13 February 2017.
  27. ^ US EIA, Natural gas wellhead value and marketed production, accessed 25 April 2015.
  28. ^ "Global natural gas prices vary considerably - Today in Energy - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)".
  29. ^ Inventory of Assessed Federal Coal Resources and Restrictions to Their Development (PDF) (Report). U.S. Departments of Energy, Interior and Agriculture. August 2007. p. 94. Retrieved March 28, 2017.
  30. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2008-09-11. Retrieved 2018-06-18.CS1 maint: Archived copy as title (link)
  31. ^ U.S. coal exports fall on lower European demand, increased global supply, US Energy Information Administration, 3 Oct. 2014.
  32. ^ a b Speight, James G. (2012-09-04). The Chemistry and Technology of Coal, Third Edition. CRC Press. p. 13. ISBN 9781439836460.
  33. ^ Trevor Houser, Jason Bordoff and Peter Marsters (April 25, 2017). "Can Coal Make a Comeback?". Center on Global Energy Policy, School of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University. Retrieved 15 May 2017. Increased competition from cheap natural gas is responsible for 49% of the decline in domestic US coal consumption. Lower-than-expected demand is responsible for 26 percent, and the growth in renewable energy is responsible for 18 percent.
  34. ^ US Dept. of Energy, "Manufacturing Trend Data" (2002), Table 2b
  35. ^ US Dept. of Energy, "Annual Energy Outlook" (February 2006), Table A2
  36. ^ US Dept. of Energy, "Buildings Energy Data Book Archived 2006-09-23 at the Wayback Machine" (September 2006), sec. 1.2.3
  37. ^ U.S. Energy Information Administration (2009), Consumption Estimates, retrieved 2011-10-03
  38. ^ New York City Mayor's Office of Sustainability (2007). "New York City's Climate Change Challenges through 2030" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-07-12. Retrieved 2007-02-28.
  39. ^ Danielle Kurtzleben. "The 10 States that Use the Least Energy Per Capita". US News & World Report.
  40. ^ Danielle Kurtzleben. "The 10 States that Use the Most Energy Per Capita". US News & World Report.
  41. ^ EPA, OA, OP, OSC, US. "Smart Growth - US EPA" (PDF). US EPA. Retrieved 14 October 2017.CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
  42. ^ "United States: Energy". CIA World Factbook 2009. Retrieved 15 June 2012.
  43. ^ [1]
  44. ^ a b c "Electric Power Annual 2017 - U.S. Energy Information Administration". Retrieved 15 March 2019.
  45. ^ "Electric Power Monthly". Retrieved 18 March 2019.
  46. ^ "Electric Power Annual"[2] retrieved 2019-2-21
  47. ^ "Electric Power Annual"[3] retrieved 2019-2-21
  48. ^ "Electric Power Annual"[4] retrieved 2019-2-21
  49. ^ "Electric Power Annual 2017 "[5] retrieved 2019-2-20
  50. ^ "Electric Power Annual"[6] retrieved 2019-2-20
  51. ^ "Demographics"2017 Population retrieved 2019-2-20
  52. ^ Electric Power Monthly [7], retrieved 2019-03-18
  53. ^ "EPA Generating Capacity"[8], retrieved 2019-2-20
  54. ^ a b "EPA Net Generation "[9], retrieved 2019-2-20
  55. ^ "EPA Import/Export "[10], retrieved 2019-2-20
  56. ^ "EPA Import/Export"Import/Export, retrieved 2019-2-20
  57. ^ "Existing Capacity" Existing Capacity, retrieved 2019-2-20
  58. ^ "Electric Power Monthly". US Energy Information Administration. Retrieved 2019-02-20.
  59. ^ a b "Electric Power Monthly - U.S. Energy Information Administration". Retrieved 3 March 2019.
  60. ^ "Electricity - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)". Retrieved 22 February 2019.
  61. ^ "Electric Power detailed State data". Retrieved 22 February 2019.
  62. ^ "Electric Power Data Browser" [ 2019-3-15
  63. ^ a b c d "State Historical Tables for 2017" (XLS). Retrieved 22 February 2019.
  64. ^ a b c d "State Historical Tables for 2016" (XLS). Retrieved 22 February 2019.
  65. ^ US Energy Information Administration, Electric Power Monthly, January 2013.
  66. ^ US Energy Information Administration,Energy monthly,, accessed 6 Nov. 2013.
  67. ^ Editorial Board (26 April 2014). "The Koch Attack on Solar Energy". The New York Times.
  68. ^ Ron Pernick and Clint Wilder (2012). "Clean Tech Nation" (PDF). p. 5.
  69. ^ US Energy Information Administration, Total Energy.
  70. ^ "Direct Federal Financial Interventions and Subsidies in Energy in Fiscal Year 2013". Energy Information Administration. Retrieved 10 November 2015.
  71. ^ US Energy Information Administration, [11], September 2013.
  72. ^ "AWEA 4th quarter 2012 Public Market Report" (PDF). American Wind Energy Association (AWEA). January 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 18, 2013. Retrieved January 30, 2013.
  73. ^ American Wind Energy Association, Annual U.S. wind power rankings track industry's rapid growth Archived 2010-06-19 at the Wayback Machine
  74. ^ "Solar Star, Largest PV Power Plant in the World, Now Operational". 24 June 2015.
  75. ^ "DOE Closes on Four Major Solar Projects". Renewable Energy World. 30 September 2011.
  76. ^ Steve Leone (7 December 2011). "Billionaire Buffett Bets on Solar Energy". Renewable Energy World.
  77. ^ SEGS I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII & IX Archived 2014-08-05 at the Wayback Machine
  78. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2009-04-29. Retrieved 2009-04-29.CS1 maint: Archived copy as title (link)
  79. ^ M.Z. Jacobson et al. 2015: 100% clean and renewable wind, water, and sunlight (WWS) all-sector energy roadmaps for the 50 United States. Energy and Environmental Science Issue 8, p. 2093-2117. doi:10.1039/C5EE01283J.
  80. ^ M.Z. Jacobson et al. 2015: Low-cost solution to the grid reliability problem with 100% penetration of intermittent wind, water, and solar for all purposes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Issue 112, Number 49, p. 15060–15065. doi:10.1073/pnas.1510028112.
  81. ^ "Per capita energy consumption has declined in the United States". Knowledge Problem.
  82. ^ "Mixing Oil and (Clean) Water". Newsweek. 7 May 2001. p. 6 of print edition. Retrieved 3 April 2018.
  83. ^ "Concentrating Solar Power Projects: Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System : Concentrating Solar Power". Retrieved 14 October 2017.
  84. ^ "Solar Energy Program". Retrieved 14 October 2017.
  85. ^ "Torresol Energy - Gemasolar thermosolar plant". Retrieved 14 October 2017.

Further reading

External links

Alternative Earth Resources

Alternative Earth Resources Inc. is an emerging renewable energy developer focused on producing clean, sustainable geothermal electric power from high temperature geothermal resources in the United States. Based in Vancouver, British Columbia, the company has six geothermal projects in the Western United States. Despite federal government loan guarantees, the company is facing financial trouble and there is "significant doubt about the company's ability to continue as a going concern".

American Solar Energy Society

The American Solar Energy Society (ASES) is an association of solar professionals and advocates in the United States. Founded in 1954, ASES is dedicated to inspiring an era of energy innovation and speeding the transition toward a sustainable energy economy. The nonprofit advances education, research and policy.

Based in Boulder, Colorado, ASES is the American affiliate of the International Solar Energy Society.

ASES publishes Solar Today magazine, organizes the National Solar Tour, produces the National Solar Energy Conference National Solar Conference and World Renewable Energy Forum 2012, and advocates for policies to promote the research, commercialization and deployment of renewable energy.

Bonneville Power Administration

The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) is an American federal agency operating in the Pacific Northwest. BPA was created by an act of Congress in 1937 to market electric power from the Bonneville Dam located on the Columbia River and to construct facilities necessary to transmit that power. Congress has since designated Bonneville to be the marketing agent for power from all of the federally owned hydroelectric projects in the Pacific Northwest. Bonneville is one of four regional Federal power marketing agencies within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).

Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor

The Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor (ESBWR) is a passively safe generation III+ reactor design derived from its predecessor, the Simplified Boiling Water Reactor (SBWR) and from the Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (ABWR). All are designs by GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy (GEH), and are based on previous Boiling Water Reactor designs.


General Electric's BWR product line of Boiling Water Reactors represents the designs of a large percentage of the commercial fission reactors around the world.

Geothermal energy in the United States

Geothermal energy in the United States was first used for electric power production in 1960. The Geysers in California was developed into what is now the largest geothermal steam electrical plant in the world, at 750 megawatts. Other geothermal steam fields are known in the western United States and Alaska. Geothermally-generated electric power can be dispatchable to follow the demands of changing loads. Environmental impact of this energy source includes hydrogen sulfide emissions, corrosive or saline chemicals discharged in waste water, possible seismic effects from water injection into rock formations, wast heat and noise.

Licensed to Kill?

Licensed to Kill? The Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Shoreham Power Plant, a 1998 book by Joan Aron, presents the first detailed case study of how an activist public and elected officials of New York state opposed the Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant on Long Island. The book explains that nuclear power faltered when "public concerns about health, safety, and the environment superseded other interests about national security or energy supplies".Aron argues that the Shoreham closure resulted from the collapse of public trust for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the entire nuclear industry. For Aron, the unwillingness of the Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO) management to consider true public interest in the debate resulted in "the loss of the goodwill of its customers". Also, the willingness of LILCO to press on with plans for Shoreham despite changes in the economics of nuclear power and market demand "reflected a basic failure of foresight".

New Energy for America

New Energy for America was a plan led by Barack Obama and Joe Biden to invest in renewable energy sources, reduce reliance on foreign oil, address global warming issues, and create jobs for Americans.

Nuclear Implosions

Nuclear Implosions: The Rise and Fall of the Washington Public Power Supply System is a 2008 book by Daniel Pope, a history professor at the University of Oregon, which traces the history of the Washington Public Power Supply System, a public agency which undertook to build five large nuclear power plants, one of the most ambitious U.S. construction projects in the 1970s.

By 1983, cost overruns and delays, along with a slowing of electricity demand growth, led to cancellation of two plants and a construction halt on two others. Moreover, the agency defaulted on $2.25 billion of municipal bonds, which is still the largest municipal bond default in U.S. history. The court case that followed took nearly a decade to resolve.

Nuclear power in the United States

Nuclear power in the United States is provided by 99 commercial reactors with a net capacity of 100,350 megawatts (MW), 65 pressurized water reactors and 34 boiling water reactors. In 2016 they produced a total of 805.3 terawatt-hours of electricity, which accounted for 19.7% of the nation's total electric energy generation. In 2016, nuclear energy comprised nearly 60 percent of U.S. emission-free generation.As of September 2017, there are two new reactors under construction with a gross electrical capacity of 2,500 MW, while 34 reactors have been permanently shut down. The United States is the world's largest producer of commercial nuclear power, and in 2013 generated 33% of the world's nuclear electricity.As of October 2014, the NRC has granted license renewals providing a 20-year extension to a total of 74 reactors. In early 2014, the NRC prepared to receive the first applications of license renewal beyond 60 years of reactor life, as early as 2017, a process which by law requires public involvement. Licenses for 22 reactors are due to expire before the end of the next decade if no renewals are granted. The Fort Calhoun Nuclear Generating Station was the most recent nuclear power plant to be decommissioned, on October 24, 2016. Another five aging reactors were permanently closed in 2013 and 2014 before their licenses expired because of high maintenance and repair costs at a time when natural gas prices have fallen: San Onofre 2 and 3 in California, Crystal River 3 in Florida, Vermont Yankee in Vermont, and Kewaunee in Wisconsin, and New York State is seeking to close Indian Point in Buchanan, 30 miles from New York City.Most reactors began construction by 1974; following the Three Mile Island accident in 1979 and changing economics, many planned projects were canceled. More than 100 orders for nuclear power reactors, many already under construction, were canceled in the 1970s and 1980s, bankrupting some companies. Up until 2013, there had also been no ground-breaking on new nuclear reactors at existing power plants since 1977. Then in 2012, the NRC approved construction of four new reactors at existing nuclear plants. Construction of the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3 began on March 9, 2013 but was abandoned on July 31, 2017 after the reactor supplier Westinghouse filed for bankruptcy protection on March 29, 2017. On March 12, 2013 construction began on the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Units 3 and 4, the target in-service date for Unit 3 is November 2021. On October 19, 2016 TVA's Unit-2 reactor at the Watts Bar Nuclear Generating Station became the first US reactor to enter commercial operation since 1996.There was a revival of interest in nuclear power in the 2000s, with talk of a "nuclear renaissance", supported particularly by the Nuclear Power 2010 Program. A number of applications were made, but facing economic challenges, and later in the wake of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster, most of these projects have been cancelled, and as of 2012, "nuclear industry officials said in 2012 they expect five new reactors to enter service by 2020 – Southern's two Vogtle reactors, two at Summer in South Carolina and one at Watts Bar in Tennessee"; these are all at existing plants. As of August 1, 2017, Watts Bar is operating, there are construction delays at Vogtle and construction at Summer has been abandoned.

PACE financing

PACE financing (property assessed clean energy financing) is a means of financing energy efficiency upgrades, disaster resiliency improvements, water conservation measures, or renewable energy installations of residential, commercial, and industrial property owners. Depending on state legislation, PACE financing can be used to finance building envelope energy efficiency improvements such as insulation and air sealing, cool roofs, water efficiency products, seismic retrofits, and hurricane preparedness measures. In some states, commercial PACE financing can also fund a portion of new construction projects, as long as the building owner agrees to build the new structure to exceed the local energy code.

Examples of energy efficiency and renewable energy upgrades range from adding more attic insulation to installing rooftop solar panels for residential projects and chillers, boilers, LED lighting and roofing for commercial projects. In areas with PACE legislation in place, governments offer a specific bond to investors or in the case of the open-market model, private lenders provide financing to the building owners to put towards an energy retrofit. The loans are repaid over the selected term (over the course of somewhere between 5 and 25 years) via an annual assessment on their property tax bill. PACE bonds can be issued by municipal financing districts, state agencies or finance companies and the proceeds can be used to retrofit both commercial and residential properties. One of the most notable characteristics of PACE programs is that the loan is attached to the property rather than an individual. A PACE loan is therefore said to be nonrecourse to the borrower.PACE can also be used to finance leases and power purchase agreements (PPAs). In this structure, the PACE property tax assessment is used to collect a lease payment of services fee. The primary benefit of this approach is that project costs may be lower due to the provider retaining the tax incentives and passing the benefit on to the property owner as a lower lease or services payment.

PACE programs help home and business owners pay for the upfront costs of green initiatives, such as solar panels, which the property owner then pays back by increasing property taxes by a set rate for an agreed-upon term ranging from 5–25 years. This allows property owners to begin saving on energy costs while they are paying for their solar panels. This usually means that property owners have net gains even with increased property tax.

Renewable energy in the United States

Renewable energy accounted for 12.2 % of total primary energy consumption and 14.94 % of the domestically produced electricity in the United States in 2016.Hydroelectric power is currently the largest producer of renewable electricity in the country, generating around 6.5% of the nation's total electricity in 2016 as well as 45.71% of the total renewable electricity generation.

The United States is the fourth largest producer of hydroelectricity in the world after China, Canada and Brazil.

The next largest share of renewable power was provided by wind power at 5.55% of total power production, amounting to 226.5 terawatt-hours during 2016. By January 2017, the United States nameplate generating capacity for wind power was 82,183 megawatts (MW). Texas remained firmly established as the leader in wind power deployment, followed by Iowa and Oklahoma as of year end 2016.Solar power provides a growing share of electricity in the country, with over 50 GW of installed capacity generating about 1.3% of the country's total electricity supply in 2017, up from 0.9% the previous year.

As of 2016, more than 260,000 people worked in the solar industry and 43 states deployed net metering, where energy utilities bought back excess power generated by solar arrays. Large photovoltaic power plants in the United States include Mount Signal Solar (600 MW) and Solar Star (579 MW). Since the United States pioneered solar thermal power technology in the 1980s with Solar One, several more such power stations have been built. The largest of these solar thermal power stations are the Ivanpah Solar Power Facility (392 MW), southwest of Las Vegas, and the SEGS group of plants in the Mojave Desert, with a total generating capacity of 354 MW.Other renewable energy sources include geothermal, with The Geysers in Northern California the largest geothermal complex in the world.

The development of renewable energy and energy efficiency marked "a new era of energy exploration" in the United States, according to former President Barack Obama. In a joint address to the Congress on February 24, 2009, President Obama called for doubling renewable energy within the following three years. Renewable energy reached a major milestone in the first quarter of 2011, when it contributed 11.7 % of total national energy production (2.245 quadrillion BTU of energy), surpassing energy production from nuclear power (2.125 quadrillion BTU) for the first time since 1997.

In his 2012 State of the Union address, President Barack Obama restated his commitment to renewable energy and mentioned the long-standing Interior Department commitment to permit 10,000 MW of renewable energy projects on public land in 2012.

Rural Utilities Service

The United States Rural Utilities Service (RUS) administers programs that provide infrastructure or infrastructure improvements to rural communities. These include water and waste treatment, electric power, and telecommunications services. it is an operating unit of the USDA Rural Development agency of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). It was created in 1935 as the Rural Electrification Administration (REA), a New Deal agency promoting rural electrification.

A total of 890 rural electric and 800 rural telecommunications utilities in 47 states, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, the Marshall Islands, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Federated States of Micronesia have received financial assistance. Approximately 7,200 rural communities are served through financial assistance received from water and waste loans and grants.The RUS administers the following programs:

Water and Environmental: provides financial assistance for drinking water, sanitary sewer, solid waste and storm drainage facilities in rural areas and communities with a population of 10,000 or less.

Electric Programs: help maintain, expand, upgrade and modernize the rural electric infrastructure. It also supports demand-side management, energy efficiency and conservation programs, and on-and off-grid renewable energy systems.

Telecommunications: helps deploy the rural telecommunications infrastructure.

Solar Energy Industries Association

The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), established in 1974, is a national non-profit trade association of the solar-energy industry in the United States.

SEIA is a 501(c)6 non-profit trade association. SEIA's sister organization, The Solar Foundation, a 501(c)3 non-profit charitable organization, oversees policy-driven research and develops education & outreach programs to promote the further development of solar energy in the U.S.The association supports the extension of a 30 percent federal solar investment tax credit for eight years.With the recent high flux of green jobs in the solar industry, SEIA maintains a resource for those looking for solar jobs. The Harvard Business Review claims that the solar industry could absorb all of the jobs lost to the coal industry as it shutters. Solar already employs more people than the entire US coal industry.

The Cult of the Atom

The Cult of the Atom: The Secret Papers of the Atomic Energy Commission is a 1982 book by Daniel Ford. Ford is an economist and former director of the Union of Concerned Scientists, who used the Freedom of Information Act to access thousands of Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) documents. The AEC was the predecessor of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.The Cult of the Atom is a piece of political literature that discusses issues brought up by the nuclear disarmament movement.

U.S. Green Building Council

The U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), co-founded by Mike Italiano, David Gottfried and Rick Fedrizzi in 1993, is a private 501(c)3, membership-based non-profit organization that promotes sustainability in building design, construction, and operation. USGBC is best known for its development of the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) green building rating systems and its annual Greenbuild International Conference and Expo, the world’s largest conference and expo dedicated to green building. USGBC was one of eight national councils that helped found the World Green Building Council (WorldGBC). The current president and CEO is Mahesh Ramanujam who acquired this role in January 2017 after co-founder Rick Fedrizzi.

Through its partnership with the Green Business Certification Inc. (GBCI), USGBC offers a suite of LEED professional credentials that denote expertise in the field of green building. USGBC incentivizes LEED certification by awarding extra certification points to building projects completed with a LEED-certified professional on staff.

United States House Committee on Energy and Commerce

The Committee on Energy and Commerce is one of the oldest standing committees of the United States House of Representatives. Established in 1795, it has operated continuously—with various name changes and jurisdictional changes—for more than 200 years. The two other House standing committees with such continuous operation are the House Ways and Means Committee and the House Rules Committee. The Committee has served as the principal guide for the House in matters relating to the promotion of commerce and to the public’s health and marketplace interests, with the relatively recent addition of energy considerations among them.

United States Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

The United States Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources has jurisdiction over matters related to energy and nuclear waste policy, territorial policy, native Hawaiian matters, and public lands.

Its roots go back to the Committee on Interior and Insulars Affair. In 1977, it became the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, and Indian Affairs were removed from its jurisdiction into its own committee.

We Almost Lost Detroit

We Almost Lost Detroit, a 1975 Reader's Digest book by John G. Fuller, presents a history of Fermi 1, America's first commercial breeder reactor, with emphasis on the 1966 partial nuclear meltdown.It took four years for the reactor to be repaired, and then performance was poor. In 1972, the reactor core was dismantled and the reactor was decommissioned. America's first effort at operating a full-scale breeder had failed.

Energy in the United States
Politics and law
Energy by state
Environmental issues
Governmental Agencies
Energy in North America
Sovereign states
Dependencies and
other territories
United States articles

This page is based on a Wikipedia article written by authors (here).
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.